Delegates renew medical aid-in-dying bill, but Senate hurdle remains

The moral dilemmas the bill presents were on display during Monday’s joint House hearing.

Supporters say the bill grants dying patients the ability to set the terms of their deaths, rather than waiting for the end to come — possibly in severe pain due to their illnesses.

“I ask you all, yet again, how many more Marylanders have to die without this option?” asked Brandi Alexander, an advocate with Compassion and Choices, a nonprofit advocacy group pushing for aid-in-dying legislation across the U.S.

“We sit here year after year, debating opinions and statistics and facts, but this is about people – dying people that, frankly, deserve more from their leadership,” said Alexander, a Prince George’s County resident.

She referenced a survey of Maryland voters last year on the issue that found nearly 70% of Marylanders supported medical aid-in-dying options. The poll was conducted by Annapolis-based Gonzales Research & Media and commissioned by Compassion and Choices.

“Yet and still, we continue to spend hours and now years actually pontificating while dying people are suffering,” Alexander said.

Del. Brian Chisholm (R-Anne Arundel) noted the reappearance of the bill over the years, but said he held “the same reservations about this bill” this session as he has in the past.

“There are a lot of vulnerable people. There are people who are disabled … there’s people who can’t communicate,” he said. “And that’s always going to be my concern with this legislation. People with Alzheimer’s, starting to lose their mind, people who are elderly who are not all the way there.

“I just don’t know if there are enough protections that could ever be put in place to make sure that the most,” he said.

Laura Bogley, executive director for Maryland Right to Life, worries that passing the current bill would snowball into bigger issues.

“A procedure that begins with safe, legal and rare can quickly become an unregulated monopoly that deprives patients access to life-saving alternatives,” she said. “We urge you to put patients over profits and keep assisted suicide in criminal codes where it belongs.”

The disability community were split on the issue Monday.

Nicole LeBlanc, a resident from Silver Spring who is on the autism spectrum, opposes the legislation. She fears people with disabilities would consider medical aid-in-dying options because they “don’t want to be to be a burden to their families.”

But Seth Morgan, who has multiple sclerosis and also advocates for Compassion and Choices, supports the bill because “disability is not a terminal illness” and he believes there are enough protections in it to protect the disability community from widespread misuse of the bill.

Hill assured that those who are not mentally capable of making their own medical decisions would not be eligible to receive medical aid-in-dying options.

But without support from the Judicial Proceedings Committee, the fight could continue for another year, to the disappointment of advocates who support of the legislation.

“If I sound angry, it’s because we’ve worked for 10 years and it’s usually some kind of political pandering that doesn’t let this bill see the daylight,” Edna Hirsch said in support of the legislation Monday. “Please, I beg you, let this get to the General Assembly. Let it get out of committee and let it get voted on.”