MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • Education
  • Donate to the Centreville Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Spy Community Media
    • Chestertown Spy
    • Talbot Spy
    • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
February 15, 2026

Centreville Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Centreville

  • Home
  • Education
  • Donate to the Centreville Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Spy Community Media
    • Chestertown Spy
    • Talbot Spy
    • Cambridge Spy
Point of View Hugh Spy Highlights

The False Nostalgia of Movie Theaters by Hugh Panero

December 15, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

The battle over Netflix’s bid to buy Warner Bros. has triggered fears that it will mean the end of the movie theater. The reaction is based on nostalgic feelings people have for the movie theater experience growing up, which ignores the bad and focuses only on the good. 

First, the good. I have funny memories of going to the movie theater. I once convinced my mother to drop my brother Doug and me off at a local movie theater to see what I thought was a Flash Gordon sci-fi action movie. I was wrong. It was an R-rated sci-fi sex comedy called Flesh Gordon (1974), and somehow we got in. We realized something was wrong when Flash (or Flesh) fought large monsters that resembled a well-known male body part. We laughed through the movie and never told our mother about our R-rated experience. 

I once took a date to see The Exorcist, famous for its terrifying scenes. The theater was located in the Marble Hill section of the Bronx. The smart-ass neighborhood kids would loiter outside by the venue’s metal fire exit door. On cue, precisely timed to coincide with a terrifying scene, they would bang on the metal door, producing a thunderous sound that made everyone leap out of their seats in terror. I never went to another scary movie after that. 

After completing a stressful work project, I left work early and needed something mindless to do, so I bought a ticket to an afternoon showing of Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) at a sketchy midtown Times Square theater near work. The sparse crowd included prostitutes, drunks, and me. I guess everyone needs downtime. Several minutes into the movie, Rambo began killing people, and the crowd started to count out after each kill loudly: ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, and eventually TWENTY TWO, TWENTY THREE, and so on. After the villain killed Rambo’s love interest, one drunk patron stood up and yelled, “NOW YOU’RE GOING TO GET IT SUCKER!!” and the counting continued NINETY SIX, NINETY SEVEN, with each Russian soldier fatality until the end of the movie when the crowd stood and broke into applause.     

My funniest movie theater moment happened at a screening of The Mambo Kings (1992), based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel. It starred a handsome Armand Assante and young Antonio Banderas, who played Cesar and Nestor Castello, Cuban musician brothers trying to break into the music business.

The theater was dead silent until Armand Assante made a stunning, sexy, cinematic entrance onto the big screen, provoking a primal sound from my wife seated next to me. Spontaneously, she had yelled out, “OH MY,” upon seeing him. Everyone in the audience laughed, especially the other women, who had a similar feeling but managed to keep their hot flash moment to themselves. I quickly turned to my wife and said, “Mary Beth, I am sitting right here,” to which she amusingly responded, “Oops!” My wife is hilarious. 

Setting aside these funny, nostalgic memories, the hard truth is that the movie theater business has been dead for a very long time. It just does not know it. There was a time when theaters were the only way to see movies. A recent WSJ article mused that in 1929, “an average of 95 million people, or nearly four-fifths of the U.S. population, saw a film every week, how things have changed. In 2019, the year before the Pandemic, ticket sales numbered 1.2 billion, and last year only 760 million. Ticket prices have gone up over the years to offset lower attendance. Studios increasingly rely on international theatrical revenue, which accounts for over 50 percent of ticket sales.

There was a time when studios owned the content, the movie theaters, and had actors, writers, and directors as contract employees under the studio’s dominant control. In 1948, the government sued the studios in a landmark antitrust case. The Supreme Court ended the studios’ monopolistic control over the industry, forcing them to sell off their movie theaters.

What is killing theaters is that the business model and the consumer experience stinks (except for IMAX). Studios control the content, and when the product is bad, fewer people show up to buy tickets and food. Studios also take 90 percent of a blockbuster film’s ticket revenue for a set period at the beginning of its theatrical run, when it is heavily promoted and in high demand. Therefore, theaters must rely on concession sales to make a buck. This is why popcorn costs $20, candy $15, and you’re forced to sit through 30 minutes of annoying paid advertising before the movie begins. When studios have a few bad years at the box office in a row, it can nudge theater chains into bankruptcy.

New technologies have been a persistent competitive challenge for theater owners. It began with the introduction of TV, then cable & satellite TV, home video, video-on-demand, Pay TV, the internet, and now premium streaming services. Theater owners have always reacted slowly to combat new technology. Theater chains have spruced up some venues, adding assigned seating, better food options, liquor, and comfy reclining chairs, but it’s too little, too late. 

For decades, studios managed new technology by controlling a film’s release schedule across distribution platforms, a practice called windowing. The first window, movie theaters, set the film’s value based on its box office performance; several months later, after milking theatrical, the film would sequentially move to video rentals, then video on demand, pay TV (HBO), and finally to cable channels, and so on. This disciplined control was disrupted when studios, now part of large, vertically integrated media giants, entered the direct-to-consumer streaming business as traditional middlemen distributors like cable TV faded. To attract subscribers, studios funneled their hit movies to their exclusive streaming platforms. They also spent billions producing exclusive original content that bypassed theaters or had only a brief theatrical run to qualify for awards. Studios were now competing directly with their theater distributors for consumer attention and dollars.

Blockbuster Marvel superhero films were a shot in the arm for theater owners, driving millions of fans into their multiplex venues. It kicked off with Iron Man (2008), leading to multiple franchises and the Avengers, which dominated the box office for years. However, these films became increasingly expensive to make, requiring stronger box-office performance. Unfortunately, the superhero genre became oversaturated, and quality suffered as a result.

This turned off consumers who could skip the movie theater altogether and wait for films to hit their streaming services, then watch them at home on their big-screen TVs—no babysitters, parking, bad food, dirty theaters, or long bathroom lines.

I admit I have not had as many funny moments watching popular streaming movies at home, mainly because my wife and her best friend, Sue, like to talk during the film, a violation of one of my core movie-viewing rules, which they ignore. Movie theaters will hang on for a while as a way for parents to entertain young kids on a rainy day, as an occasional date night activity, and as a place where teenagers can hang out and canoodle away from the prying eyes of protective parents.

Eventually, the movie theater business will shrink further and become a boutique, nostalgic experience, much like shopping for records at a vinyl record store. 

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech, Media, and other stuff for the Spy.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Hugh, Spy Highlights

Netflix Makes a Blockbuster Move for Warner Bros by Hugh Panero

December 8, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

Last week, Netflix announced a blockbuster deal to purchase Warner Bros., including the film studio, the HBO MAX streaming service, and HBO, for $72 billion, to solidify its already dominant position in premium streaming with an impressive 300 million subscribers worldwide.

Since its inception, Netflix has built its enormous business organically rather than through acquisitions. This deal is their first foray into a big-time, public acquisition battle. It is why their aggressive offer was such a surprise. The Netflix deal is far from done.

The Netflix offer beat out bids from Comcast Universal and David Ellison, the ultimate nepo baby son of Oracle billionaire founder Larry Ellison (3rd richest man in the world). David Ellison’s media company, Skydance, recently acquired National Amusement and Paramount for $8 billion, and needs Warner Bros. content assets to compete with the big boys – Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Disney. Otherwise, it is a weaker player with a lot of debt, and traditional assets like CBS Network, sports entertainment, UFC, a damaged Paramount Skydance studio, a bunch of dying cable TV channels (i.e., Nickelodeon, MTV, Comedy Central), and other properties few want.

Netflix’s surprise bid has truly screwed up Ellison’s grand vision to become the newest media grand pooh-bah. The Ellisons have been kissing Trump’s ass for months to gain favor. His buttocks smooches include settling Trump’s 60 Minutes defamation lawsuit for $16 million, the firing of Stephen Colbert, and the controversial hiring of Bari Weiss to lead a more MAGA-friendly CBS News, and other assorted payoffs to disgustingly gain favor. Trump never lets a good grift opportunity pass him by, so get ready for more donations to Trump’s favorite projects.

I assume the Ellisons have reached out to Trump, urging him to get his Department of Justice (DOJ) to kill the Netflix deal. US Attorney General Pam Bondi is likely waiting for the President’s call and marching orders. Trump has several cards to play. He can direct Bondi to kill the deal, claim it is anti-competitive, and go to court to stop it and try to redirect it to Ellison. No doubt that an agreement with Ellison/Skydance has an easier regulatory path. However, Ellison may have overplayed his hand with his heavy-handed pressure campaign to get Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav to sell the company to him.

Media outlets have reported that Ellison has boasted that he is Trump’s preferred buyer and that he should even receive a discount because that relationship ensures the deal will close. Zazlav, his Board, and his media mogul mentor, John Malone (Warner Bros. Discovery Chair Emeritus), are not people who like being bullied and are focused on getting the best price.

Trump could also direct Bondi to extract bigger concessions from Netflix to secure the deal. For example, a more sticky commitment for WB and other Netflix movies to have a theatrical release. What about a Netflix commitment to freeze monthly streaming rates for a period of time? Trump can then claim that he is doing concrete things to keep media “affordable” for consumers while kidnapping a favorite Democrat theme. This is my idea and not something being discussed in the media.

If the DOJ cannot cut a deal with Netflix, it will tell Netflix that it intends to sue to stop the deal. Netflix will then have to choose between fighting it out in court or walking away from the deal. The Netflix deal reportedly also has a $5.8 billion breakup fee to keep Warner Bros. and Netflix from getting cold feet. This battle will get dirty with various players unleashing their lobbyists, lawyers, and PR firms on regulators, shareholders and the public.

Another factor is time. It could take up to a year to litigate this matter. I have lived this experience. Warner Bros. will be frozen for a year, limiting dealmaking and risking the loss of senior executives unless they are incentivized to stick around through the process. Netflix (or anyone else) must get a deal done before 2028, when Democrats might take over, and they will definitely kill the deal.

There are many legitimate reasons to challenge the Netflix deal on antitrust grounds. The deal is for the #1 US premium streaming service (Netflix) to acquire the #3 streaming service (HBO MAX) and its vast library of movie and TV content. It will also result in the elimination a major competitor. There are also far fewer people in the US and abroad, in favor of the deal as opposed to it, which includes: movie theater owners, the Hollywood creative community, unions, and anti-big tech politicians and regulators worldwide.

According to Forbes, Netflix will argue that its real digital video competitor for consumers’ streaming attention is YouTube, which, according to Nielsen, accounts for about 13% of all streaming compared to 8% for Netflix and 1.3% for HBO MAX, although YouTube does not stream premium movie content.

Any Warner Bros. sale will likely trigger manic media acquisition activity as the boards of directors for the other media titans absorb the ramifications of the shrinking media landscape. They may decide they also need to get bigger to compete, and the purchase window is closing. For example, is Disney/ABC now in play? A clear target for Apple and others.

On a practical basis, how will the Warner Bros. sale affect you based on who the buyer is?

Winner Netflix. Warner Bros. content will be absorbed into the Netflix platform. This includes the HBO MAX streaming service, which will eventually be shut down. Warner Bros. currently makes content for other services. For example, Warner Bros. TV is involved in popular Apple TV shows Ted Lasso and Shrinking. I assume these kinds of deals will end after their current contracts expire if Netflix prevails. Netflix will not acquire Warner Bros. cable properties (CNN, TNT, and HGTV). Before a Netflix deal closes, these properties will be spun off into a separate company, Discovery Global. I would not be surprised if they are sold off.

Winner Ellison/Skydance: Warner content will be absorbed into their Paramount+ streaming service. The name will likely change, since Warner Bros. and HBO are stronger brands than Paramount+, and the newly bulked-up streaming service name might need to reflect that. The cable properties will be absorbed and added to its existing portfolio of underperforming cable assets caused by cord-cutting. CNN would likely report to Bari Weiss, who runs CBS News operations, and undergo a painful purge and MAGAfication to appease Trump further. So long, Jake, Anderson, etc.

Winner Comcast Universal: You will see a similar dynamic. Warner Bros. content would be integrated into the Universal Peacock streaming brand, recently bolstered by a 5-year, $1 billion deal between NBC Universal and Taylor Sheridan, the red-hot creator of Yellowstone and Tulsa King, whom they recently poached from Paramount. Comcast also plans to spin off its struggling cable properties, especially liberal MSNow (formerly MSNBC), which Trump hates; the goal is to isolate and protect its valuable Trump-regulated core assets like NBC and its TV stations from potential Trump retaliation.

In all these scenarios, expect big layoffs and monthly streaming rates to rise a year after a deal closes.

UPDATE: This morning, David Ellison’s company launched an all-cash hostile tender offer for $30 per share for all of Warner Bros., above Netflix’s $27.75 share bid — Stay tuned!

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech, Media, and other stuff for the Spy.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 00 Post to Chestertown Spy, 3 Top Story, Hugh

AI is Coming for the Music Industry

November 25, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

The song “Walk My Walk,” by the band Breaking Rust, recently hit number one on the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales chart in November 2025. What was particularly interesting, and scary, was that it was entirely AI-generated, the first time an AI-generated song topped the US Billboard chart, generating millions of streams. As of November, 3-4 million on Spotify and 11 million streams on YouTube.

I heard the song a few weeks ago. I liked it along with other songs by the band (“Livin’ on Borrowed Time” and “Whiskey Don’t Talk Back”), which also generated big streaming numbers. They all have a distinctive country blues sound. I shared a link to the song “Walk My Walk” with family and friends for a listen using Spotify.  Hear it on YouTube. 

I wanted to know more about the band and the vocalist, but it was hard to find, which was odd given how much basic marketing music labels do to promote bands. I eventually discovered that the song was AI-generated by the creator Aubierre Rivaldo Taylor. AI music has been creeping onto the music charts recently, and what seemed only an existential threat to artists is now here and number 1 on the charts. 

According to the AI chat platform ChatGPT, the song was created by the AI music platform Suno. There are no human performers. Even the singer’s “gravely Southern drawl” in the song, made to sound like a human artist like Chris Stapleton, was AI-generated, as were the rugged cowboy still and video images that depicted the artist’s fictional persona. 

I listen to a lot of music, worked as a satellite music content distributor for a long time, and I couldn’t tell that it was AI-generated. When I learned it was, I thought of my favorite sci-fi film, Blade Runner, starring Harrison Ford as a futuristic detective tasked with hunting down dangerous synthetic humanoid robots called Replicants. 

In the movie, the only way to know whether someone was human or a replicant was to administer a test that measured involuntary physiological responses to emotionally provocative questions. The test assesses empathy by hypothesizing that a human’s empathetic response will differ from a replicant’s.  

The music industry is going to need a lot of Blade Runner AI detectives to determine whether a song was created by human artistry or AI, a distinction this AI song has blurred. Its popularity has reignited the heated debate about AI and the future of music creation by living and breathing artists. 

AI models like Suno are trained using vast amounts of copyrighted music from existing databases without the explicit consent or compensation of the original creators, unless side deals are made similar to those OpenAI has made with newspapers and other content providers. 

The use of this data to create new, commercially successful songs, without compensation, is seen by artists and music labels as theft, raising questions about intellectual property rights in the world of AI.

How much of “Walk My Walk” came out of digital fragments of works from artists, dead or alive, and how should they or their estates be compensated? Let the lawsuits begin. Several major entities, including music labels and organizations representing independent artists, have sued Suno, a venture-backed AI company, for copyright infringement. 

I am on the artist’s side. Our culture romanticizes the artistic process: the poor, struggling musician pouring out their emotions, scribbling notes and lyrics on scraps of paper, waiting for their big break. We lived through this right of passage for iconic artists like Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell, and Bruce Springsteen, and it continues today.    

However, when cheaply produced AI-generated music competes for listener attention alongside human-created music, it can and will reduce the earnings potential for human artists, especially new artists struggling to make a living. The music industry’s royalty models and federal legislation are outdated and wildly ill-equipped to handle the rise of machine-generated content.

The music industry as a whole has not engendered much goodwill over the years. The industry culture is for labels to mimic successful artists to reduce risk. Pop music sounds wildly overproduced and less authentic. Music labels act like banks rather than creative shops as they used to be. Giant digital distributors like Spotify dominate the business, and monopolistic concert companies like Live Nation and ticket scalpers have driven up ticket prices to the point of being out of reach for many consumers due to rampant price gouging by bad actors.

The word ‘derivative’ in the music world has two meanings: one relating to copyright law and the other to critical and compositional discussions. In the latter, a work is described as “derivative” if it sounds unoriginal, heavily imitative, or lacks fresh solutions. 

Under U.S. copyright law, a “derivative work” is a new, original work that is based on or incorporates substantial copyrightable elements of one or more pre-existing works. This differs from a standard cover song (i.e, Harold Arlen’s “Over the Rainbow”), which is a straightforward interpretation of the original, with minimal changes to the core melody or lyrics.  

Legally, you must get explicit permission from the original copyright holder to create and distribute a derivative work. The original copyright holder reserves the exclusive right to authorize adaptations of their work. For example, remixes, mashups, and medleys; musical arrangements that significantly alter the original melody, harmony, or lyrics; song translations into a different language, and works that heavily sample an existing sound recording. 

Tech giants’ rapid innovation has allowed, even encouraged, widespread copyright infringement.  AI will obliterate the quaint definition of derivative work. Imagine every song ever copyrighted ingested into an AI platform like Suno, which analyzes a user’s text prompt describing the style, mood, or genre of a song they want to create, which might include specific instructions or phrases, as well as a request for a cool Santana-like guitar riff. And VIOLA! 

We have to support artists, and need a new regulatory framework to protect the integrity of the music industry, requiring at a minimum:

Mandatory AI Transparency: Clear labeling of AI-generated music to help listeners make informed choices.

Build Forensic AI Models: We need AI tools that can uncover the digital building blocks underlying AI-generated content, enabling us to determine artist compensation.

Create New Federal Regulations: Congress needs to update copyright laws to address the challenges posed by AI. Prioritizing artist consent and fair compensation. 

The live concert experience is safe from the AI monster, since it is impossible for an AI algorithm to replicate the feeling of seeing your favorite artists perform live.

I recently attended the Natalie Merchant concert at the Avalon in Easton, MD. I have followed her since her days with 10,000 Manics. At 62, performing an acoustic set with only a guitarist, her voice remains strong and authentic. She interacted with the crowd with warmth and humor, something an algorithm cannot do, at least for now – Thank God for that. 

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech, Media, and other stuff for the Spy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

ICE Trauma and Drama on the Shore by Hugh Panero

August 18, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

Daily images of hooded, heavily armed ICE agents snatching people on US soil are traumatizing. As reported in the Spy in July, this hit home in Easton, Maryland, when ICE agents arrested Pastor Daniel Fuentes Espinal, who has served as the Minister of Iglesia del Nazareno Jesus Te Ama church for ten years. After picking up construction materials at Lowe’s, he went to McDonald’s for breakfast and was arrested on Route 322. He had no criminal record.

Pastor Espinal was detained at the Winn Correctional Center deep in the Kisatchie National Forest in rural Louisiana while awaiting a bond hearing. We learned on Saturday that he was finally granted a bond earlier in the week and is now home with his family in Easton. A GoFundMe campaign has raised $50,954 for his legal expenses.

The White House spin used to be that ICE activities were focused on deporting undocumented immigrants who were criminals. During the election, President Trump lumped immigrants into a false and ugly anti-immigrant narrative. He called them all rapists, gang members, and drug dealers, who were flooding across our border. His racist narrative was designed to rile his base during the election. However, we have come to realize that the Administration’s goal is more sinister and focused on reducing the US immigrant population and not just about removing dangerous criminals. 

The Administration’s 3,000 daily deportation quota, designed by Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff and resident troll, is intended to throw a much wider deportation net to include immigrants here legally. Miller’s long-term goal is to eliminate birthright citizenship, gut various pathways to lawful permanent residency (green card), limit and rescind non-immigrant visas for temporary stays, and halt humanitarian and refugee status. 

A young Maryland man was snatched and arrested at his home despite telling ICE agents he was in the US legally and married to a US citizen. Luckily, his family contacted Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen’s office and got lawyers involved before he was disappeared. In Los Angeles, a day laborer was recently hit by a car and killed on the 210 Freeway while fleeing an ICE raid at a Home Depot. Here in Easton, an ICE van menacingly parked for several hours outside the George Murphy Community pool while children swam on a hot day.  A young man in Talbot County waiting to get day work was picked up by masked ICE agents and whisked away. This is not who we are.

Why is ICE not scooping up business owners with the same enthusiasm as they go after undocumented immigrants? Businesses in need of cheap labor play dumb regarding their workers’ immigration status. Lawyers call that “willful blindness”. The fact that ICE tactics do not include going after the demand side for these workers is a tell that ICE’s strategy is not a serious effort, and more about politics, race, and a show of macho power.

ICE wants to do its snatching at warp speed, so the target’s support network has no time to react and intervene, resulting in no due process. Even if you can determine where a loved one is being held, it is hard to post a bond for release while the situation is being resolved.

According to the Texas Tribune, Jaime Galvin Sanchez “has lived in the US for more than 20 years. He was deported in less than 24 hours without due process.” In many cases, ICE uses “Expedited Removal Authority” to snatch people. The concept was established as part of the 1996 Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act. It allows certain noncitizens to be removed from the US without a hearing before an immigration judge. In the past, Expedited Removal was mainly applied to people who arrived at a port of entry without proper documentation, or who had entered the country illegally and been in the US for less than two years. Trump expanded the use of expedited removal authority to remove obstacles to speedy deportation. It limits access to an attorney, bypasses a court hearing before an immigration judge, and provides no appeal options. Fortunately, Mr. Sanchez’s daughter showed up with utility bills, property tax documents, and his kids’ birth certificates to prove he has been living in the US for decades. He was eventually returned to his family, which is rare. 

The Administration’s ultimate goal is to traumatize legal and undocumented immigrants by making living here brutal, foment fear, and motivate immigrants to self-deport, described as “Attrition through Enforcement”. Trump’s attack dog, Border Czar Tom Homan, does not care if innocent people get snatched. Whenever confronted by reporters with examples of ICE agents overstepping their legal authority or mistakenly arresting or deporting US citizens and people in the US legally, he growls and responds with a “shit happens” attitude. 

Then there is the story of Amir, a young Afghan who saved American soldiers’ lives during the Afghan War. He was 18 years old and served as an interpreter. Several times, he saved the life of Dewy Yopp, a retired Special Forces officer. After the 2021 US withdrawal, Amir received a special immigrant visa for Afghan allies for his help during the Afghan War. A promise fulfilled by our government to Afghans who risked their lives and their families’ lives during the war. Trump now wants to end the Temporary Protected Status for Afghan refugees and return them to Afghanistan, claiming it is safe to return despite a State Department Do Not Travel Advisory and the very real threat of persecution and death for those who aided the US. 

Polling shows that images of armed ICE agents snatching people, brazenly marching around Los Angeles and other cities with AK-47s, are turning public opinion against aggressive ICE tactics and the President, which will have an impact on the 2026 mid-term elections.

Voters have also noticed that if you are a black or brown immigrant, you get profiled and picked up by ICE, but if you are white or wealthy, there are shortcuts to acquiring US citizenship. The Administration recently welcomed 60 white South Africans as refugees, saying with a straight face that they faced discrimination and violence at home, which the country’s government strongly denies. Refugee advocates wondered why these white South Africans were admitted when the administration had suspended efforts to resettle people fleeing war and persecution who had gone through years of vetting. 

Like a storyline from South Park, Trump also plans to offer a grotesque shortcut to citizenship for wealthy immigrants, not in keeping with our immigrant heritage. Trump plans to offer a Trump Gold Card for $5 million in exchange for US citizenship. A far cry from poet Emma Lazarus’ 1883 sonnet that gave a voice to the Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free….” 

Most Americans know that the majority of illegal immigrants are not rapists, gang members, or drug dealers, but people seeking a better life for their families. While many oppose blanket amnesty, they also realize that the mass deportation of 11 million people is unrealistic.

They are here doing jobs that Americans do not want to do, and that businesses and our economy need. 

It is time for Congress to deal with our broken immigration system. Demonizing immigrants may work in an election year to get votes; however, it does not work if you are serious about fixing a complex immigration system, and leaves us with hooded men in dark SUVs waiting outside car washes, Lowe’s parking lots, public pools, and Latino churches to grab people – maybe your Pastor, neighbor, or good friend.

Andrew Mills, Chief of Police for the City of Palm Springs, CA, said on social media regarding ICE activities, “You joined a Federal Agency to arrest and bag cartels. Instead, you are doing jump outs, arresting dishwashers and gardeners for working hard. You watch the 4th amendment and the 14th mendment being violated regularly behind a cloak of secrecy, wearing masks and heavy armor. There are other options.”

The best option would be comprehensive immigration reform. In 2006-2007, President George W. Bush made comprehensive immigration reform his key policy initiative. His plan proposed a “rational middle ground” where undocumented immigrants with deep roots in the US could apply for citizenship after paying fines, taxes, learning English, and working for several years, while waiting behind those who applied through existing legal channels. It also included:

Border Security: Bush called for increased funding, technology, and personnel for border enforcement, expanding the Border Patrol, and the use of the National Guard for assistance.

A Temporary Worker Program: A legal channel for foreign workers to fill jobs that American workers weren’t taking, with temporary worker status, background checks, and a return to their home countries upon expiration of their authorized stay.

Employer Accountability: Deter businesses from hiring undocumented workers by mandating the use of the E-Verify, the electronic employment verification system, and penalizing non-compliant employers.

Assimilation: The plan emphasized the importance of immigrants learning English and adopting American values to integrate into society successfully.

Bush’s effort failed. GOP Immigration hawks resisted any legalization path, and unions were not happy with the temporary work visa, among other obstacles. Conservatives claimed that amnesty violates the rule of law and rewards bad behavior. An argument that rings hollow today after the President pardoned January 6th rioters, who violently took over the Capitol, a pardon that was a direct assault on the rule of law. 

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and Media and other stuff for the Spy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Hugh

Homeland Security Threatens Canada Goose Migration by Hugh Panero

July 2, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

The announcement that President Trump has ended all tariff negotiations between the US and Canada has increased hostility between the two nations. The administration has recently turned its attention to ending the unlawful entry of Canada geese into the US, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 

Kristi Noem, the Secretary of DHS said, “It has come to our attention that these migrating geese from Canada bring Fentanyl into US, rape and harrass our non-migrating goose population and have affiliations with the notorious MS-13 gang.” Noem (aka Ice Barbie) is no friend to God’s creatures. In her memoir, she described killing her dog Cricket for having an aggressive personality. 

Officials on both sides of the border were left scratching their heads regarding this shift in US strategy, sparking a heated debate over border security and bird migration policy. Over 3.2 million Canadian Geese migrate to the US each year. According to Noem, “we became suspicious of the migrating birds based on the precision of their V-shaped flying pattern, an indication of military training.” 

Supporters of the administration’s effort to stop this unchecked Canadian goose migration point out that these large birds purposely come to the US pregnant, hoping to claim birthright citizenship as soon as the young Goslings emerge from their eggs. They also claim this species is very aggressive, disrupts our air traffic control systems, harasses golfers, takes over water nesting platforms constructed for our US-based Osprey population and shits on everything.

Border Buffers, Bird Barricades, and An Avian Iron Dome

Sources confirm that an unprecedented number of geese are now making their way to the US in anticipation of the US Air Force establishing a “No Fly Zone”. Some Geese have been seen flying with banners that say “FLY OR DIE”. DHS reportedly has big plans to utilize satellite AI technology to create an Avian Iron Dome (AID) to protect our northern border.” In the meantime, DHS is deploying drone surveillance and strategic waterfowl aerial barriers along our 5,500 mile northern border. “We’re taking every measure to ensure national waterfowl security,” an unnamed DHS spokesperson stated. “This is not just about protecting American turf; it’s about maintaining sovereignty.” 

Legal Status and Immigration Policies

Masked ICE agents have been massing on our northern border, and there is talk of mobilizing the National Guard and even the Marines. Legal experts warn that the situation could challenge existing laws governing wildlife and immigration. “Are these geese refugees or illegal aliens? Does the Migratory Bird Treaty Act provide due process protections or impose restrictions?” mused one concerned attorney. Some advocacy groups are calling for “Amnesty for the Gaggle,” and pushing for sanctuary bird policies that allow these winged migrants safe entry to parks and lakes, citing their right to pursue happiness. 

Public Reactions and Political Spin

Public opinion is fiercely divided. Politicians have stirred controversy, claiming the goose migration poses a significant national security threat, claiming “even birds must respect borders”. Others hail the geese as a welcome symbol of multicultural integration and point out that these birds make the ultimate sacrifice each year to our hunters, and that stopping their migration would harm our vibrant hunting economy and hurt small businesses.

Historians note that Canadian Geese played a crucial role in feeding the first settlers on the Eastern Shore, as described by James Michener in his book, Chesapeake. 

Many experts believe the sudden US aggression towards the Canada Geese migration into the US is President Trump’s retaliation for Canada’s refusal to become America’s 51st state and his inability to implement higher tariffs against our former ally. In an unhinged rant on Truth Social, Trump said, “I hate everything Canadian, especially their very untalented celebrities that have migrated to the US like Justin Bieber, Ryan Reynolds, and the unfunny, scum, Mike Meyers from Saturday Night Live. We should expel them all.” As for the Canadian Geese, he added, “All that squawking is about to come to an end.” Disney, bowing to pressure from the administration, has announced it will no longer include Canada geese in any of its upcoming animated children’s content and will remove images of the species from all of its copyrighted materials. 

As this migration debate intensifies, it’s clear that we may never view these seasonal feathered visitors in the same way again. 

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and media, as well as satire, for The Spy.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Hugh

Balancing the Maryland Budget in Extraordinary Times by Hugh Panero

May 12, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

Balancing the state budget in extraordinary times is hard. It is an ugly game of Whack-a-Mole. A large percentage of the expenses are baked into the budget based on prior legislative initiatives. Then, you take a whack at projecting revenue during a weak economy, manage the General Fund, which consists of revenue not dedicated to a specific purpose, and the Special Fund, which is dedicated to particular purposes. After a few more whacks at capital costs, you wrestle with budget cuts, and adding more revenue through tax modifications and increasing fees.

Then you factor in what the crazy guy in the White House is doing to the economy and the federal government, and how that will impact Maryland. Good luck with that. 

This is why being Governor is not easy. You struggle with challenging issues that require balancing various human and financial priorities while protecting the most vulnerable. Meanwhile, at the federal level, the GOP wants to cut such programs to fund a tax cut extension for the wealthy, adding trillions to the national debt. It is always rich when billionaires getting a tax cut ask everyone else to do more with less.

Another grim reality has also set in. Marylanders, including myself, have taken for granted the economic benefits afforded to Maryland due to its proximity to the federal government. Unfortunately, we are now experiencing the painful flip side of that coin as we watch the White House drop several nuclear financial bombs with a blast radius and shock wave that hits Maryland first and hardest.

The thoughtless gutting of the federal government has significantly added to Maryland’s financial problems. There are 160,000 federal workers in the state, many of whom own or rent homes in Maryland, pay taxes, and spend money, which helps fuel the state economy. Think of all the businesses and people you know, lawyers, lobbyists, contractors, scientists, and real estate professionals who provide services directly or indirectly to the federal government. Now, imagine a 30,000 reduction in federal workers who live in Maryland and its impact on our state. 

Critics of the state budget are angry at Moore and the General Assembly for tax increases that were part of a difficult effort to balance the $67 billion 2025 budget. The budget included $1.6 billion in tax and fee increases and $2 billion in spending reductions to address the $3.3 billion budget deficit. Some even called for a DOGEing of Maryland’s government institutions and “scared cows”. We have seen how badly that has worked out at the federal level.   

I supported Governor Moore and voted for Hogan twice. Nobody likes tax increases, including the Governor, but balancing any budget with a $3.3 billion deficit is challenging. Criticizing how he did it is fair game, but it’s easy when you’re not in the room doing the math. For example, I would have liked to have seen a reduction in the corporate tax, but realize when you are turning  over rocks looking for revenue, its hard to give up a chunk.

Some Republicans fantasize about Hogan running again for Governor in 2026 against Moore. Hogan fanboys and GOP strategists would love to brand Moore as a tax-and-spend Democrat, which is unfair. Serious problems are impacting Maryland, and issues like slow business growth have existed for a decade, during Hogan’s two terms and Moore’s short tenure in office. Members of both parties have acknowledged this, so let’s focus on the six key budget challenges ahead.

1- Maryland’s economy is stagnant and must improve. Last year, Comptroller Brooke Lierman issued a State of the Economy Report. Maryland’s economy began slowing in 2017 and rebounded sluggishly from COVID-19. At the time, she reported low unemployment of 1.8%, which today is 3% and will be further impacted by federal workforce reductions. Our state relies too heavily on the federal government (the top employer) to drive our economy, and we need more private sector jobs and business income. Maryland’s average household income was a healthy $108,200, ranking high nationally. Unfortunately, Maryland’s overall economy underperforms. GDP growth (personal income, real wages, and population growth) from 2016-2023 was only 1.6%, which lags behind our neighbors (PA & VA) and the US. The state’s population in 2024 was about 6.3 million, a 0.74% increase compared to 2023. And while many people move here from states with a higher cost of living, we lose people, including higher earners, who leave Maryland for less expensive states. 

2- Trump’s budget, tariffs, and other actions severely harm the State. Maryland Senate President Bill Ferguson recently said that Trump’s budget could result in an additional $430 million in federal cuts to the state. Trump’s tariff war will also result in thousands of small businesses in Maryland going bankrupt unless he finds an off-ramp. Since Trump took office, the stock market has lost trillions of dollars, damaging 401(k)s. It is also unclear if the federal government will support future funding for the Key Bridge rebuild and other Maryland capital projects available under the Biden administration. Do you remember when the worst thing Trump did to Maryland was kill the plan to build a new FBI building in Greenbelt, MD?

3- The debate about the so-called $5 billion “Surplus” handed over to Moore by Hogan is a waste of time. Lots of Federal COVID-19 money flowed into the state, which camouflaged weaknesses in the state’s economy. I assume Hogan did not know this was a fading Covid hangover surplus. I also realize Hogan had nothing to gain by reframing the reality of the surplus while running for the Senate. Also, our business-oriented Governor Moore, the General Assembly, and an accountant should have recognized the bogus nature of the surplus sooner. 

4- Blueprint for Maryland’s Future. The expensive 10-year education reform plan is a financial problem. Democrats own this plan. It was recently funded for two years ($70 million next year and $100 million the year after). Beyond that, it will be funded through the state’s General Fund, which, according to a recent Maryland Matters article, has a projected deficit of up to $3 billion by fiscal year 2030. How Moore handles this issue will be another big test. You can’t do everything. In its current form, the plan is tough on rural communities with limited resources that have been further strained as the state has pushed down other costs to the counties.

5- Medicaid Costs. As reported in the Baltimore Sun, Maryland’s share of Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Programs (CHIPS) covers roughly 1.6 million people, including long-term care coverage for low-income children, pregnant women, adults, seniors, and people with disabilities, costing about $4 billion annually. The big unknown is how federal cuts to entitlement programs will impact Maryland and other states, especially if the GOP forces states to bear more of the expense.   

6- Bond Rating Fiscal Status. A fellow Spy columnist, David Reel, recently focused attention on Maryland’s fragile bond rating, highlighting Moody’s downgrade of Maryland’s fiscal outlook from stable to negative. The Moody downgrade said, “Maryland ranks near the top for risk from changing federal priorities and policies.” Maryland Matters said, “The report highlights three factors: Federal unemployment, existing budget deficits, and concentrated federal grant funding.” It might be a while before Maryland’s AA bond rating bumps to AAA. Standard and Poors issued a negative outlook for outstanding revenue bonds issued by the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDAT), which finances new transportation projects like bridges, tunnels, and the rebuilding ($1.8 billion estimate) of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. What will happen if Trump pulls federal funding for the Key Bridge?   

Things will likely worsen before they improve, especially if Trump drives us into a recession. The current budget cycle sidestepped more painful future cuts to the Blueprint Reform plan. Democrats must take a scalpel to the plan during the next budget cycle. With so many unknowns, Governor Moore will have to be tighter on controlling costs and veto bills from the General Assembly, controlled by his party, that the state cannot afford.

One of the best things Marylanders can do to help themselves is help Democrats win the House in the midterm elections and stop Trump’s reckless actions that will hurt Maryland. 

 Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and Media and other stuff for the Spy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Hugh

In Search of a Democratic Party Pulse by Hugh Panero

April 21, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

After any painful defeat, there is an understandable period of mourning and reflection, followed by resilience and renewed energy to return to the fight. Many of us are upset by the Democratic Party’s lack of creativity, strategy, leadership, and action. An older woman attending a town hall meeting held by a Democratic congressman summed up how many of us feel during a Q&A: ” Why aren’t you angrier?” 

Where is the opposition party? Democrats are handicapped and leaderless. The GOP slimly controls all three branches of government with a President who has grabbed more presidential power than anyone in history, not in a wartime setting. Former leaders, Biden and Harris, are persona non grata, ugly reminders of how poorly the 2024 presidential race was handled, and a fresh leader has yet to emerge.

Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is ineffective, and Ken Martin, Chair of the Democratic Party, is invisible. Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies and other prominent Democrats land a few verbal blows during committee debates that go viral. This includes Congressman Jamie Raskin (D-MD-8th) and Jasmine Crockett (D-TX-30th) in the House, as well as Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut, among others. 

However, these political blows remind me of the basketball player on a team down by 30 points who executes a creative, in-your-face dunk and taunts the defender, who, with a smile on his face, simply points to the lopsided score on the Jumbotron.

Trump’s unchecked second term has lived up to the apocalyptic predictions. The assault on free speech and universities, illegal deportations, attacking judges, defying courts, the use of executive orders, the weaponization of the Justice Department to punish former colleagues and law firms whose clients Trump dislikes, and the cruel and thoughtless gutting of government. And now the Tariff War.

Whatever happened to Trump’s promise to end the Ukraine War on day one, lower inflation, and reduce our daily costs, such as eggs, among other broken promises? As Trump approaches 100 days in office, things will only worsen as he further damages our economy and turns the US into a global villain. Trump is not a person playing a well-thought-out economic chess game between Nations, but more like Marvel’s Incredible Hulk running around smashing things.

Here is a thought: whenever I start a new DIY project I know little about, I watch a lot of YouTube videos. All Trump had to do was search for a video tutorial on “How does the US bond market work, and how critical is it to fund the U.S. government’s growing debt?

For decades, our bonds were considered the safest investment haven for retirees and others balancing their portfolios, seeking to offset stock market volatility, as well as a safe place for foreign governments to park a significant amount of money. No longer. When Japan sold its US bonds due to Trump’s poorly conceived reciprocal tariff increases, it triggered stock market chaos and global economic uncertainty. The Japanese felt our bonds were neither a haven nor safe.

Keep in mind that China holds a significant portion of our debt. Trump has managed to create an unprecedented scenario where both bonds and stocks are simultaneously under threat. Seeing bond prices dramatically dip and yields increase, Trump announced a 90-day pause on his new tariff increases, reducing them to a baseline of 10%. To look tough in the face of his dramatic about-face, he increased tariffs on China, which responded in kind. 

China is a bad actor on many fronts, but before you poke that bear, Trump should have considered what America’s future looks like if we are alone in the world with no friends. Fighting with every country simultaneously, including an island inhabited by Penguins, is not a great plan. Trump’s tariff war with friend and foe has caused enormous wealth destruction. We stopped watching the news a while ago, and now we can’t look at our 401(k)s.

Even Trump’s billionaire suck up friends are having a WTF moment watching their guy take down the US and potentially the world economy. Trump reminds me of the mentally unstable golf course groundskeeper Carl Spackler from the movie Caddyshack, played by Bill Murray. Carl was so obsessed with killing that gopher that he detonated plastic explosives, destroying the golf course.

More members of the MAGA faithful, who naively thought Trump’s second-term retribution tour would not negatively impact them, will soon feel the pain. If they need help obtaining Social Security benefits, unemployment compensation, or support from the Veterans Affairs, they will be affected by massive government layoffs. Imagine what it will be like to call the IRS to resolve a problem–no one will be there to answer the phone.

Democrats have recently shown faint signs of a pulse. With no clear party leader, several people have stepped into the void. Senator Cory Booker’s 26-hour speech on the Senate floor effectively framed Trump’s Hulk-like destruction, which was widely shared on social media; Congressman Raskin, a few weeks ago, spoke on the Eastern Shore in place of Andy Harris, who had refused to hold a town hall meeting to avoid angry constituents. Democratic candidate Susan Crawford won a highly contested seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, despite Musk’s $21 million investment aimed at defeating her. Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen’s recent trip to El Salvador to meet with deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia was a thoughtful way to keep the spotlight on the Trump administration’s ugly and defiant handling of his deportation despite the Supreme Court directive. The large “Hands Off” demonstrations, attended by hundreds of thousands of protesters, were impressive, as were Bernie Sanders’ and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s well-attended “Fighting Oligarchy” rallies. While these successes are encouraging, Democrats must articulate a broader strategic plan and a better sales pitch, especially in the wake of the 2024 debacle.

How will Democrats defend Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which the GOP needs to cut to fund Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy? When did tax cuts for wealthy Americans take priority over helping children with severe disabilities who rely on Medicaid, now threatened by billionaire Elon Musk and the GOP?   

Cranky Democratic political strategist James Carville, in a recent NY Times editorial, explained that the faltering economy is what voters care about, presenting a massive opportunity for Democrats to make their case. Democrats need to build on their recent life signs. There was discussion about establishing a war room and a shadow cabinet to enable a swift and relentless response to the day’s issues. Why not send the party’s best communicators around the country? Let Bernie & AOC focus on fighting oligarchs, but have others, such as Josh Shapiro, Pete Buttigieg, Andy Beshear, Gretchen Whitmer, and Newsome, barnstorm the country discussing other vital subjects, like the faltering economy. 

Democrats need more than just a faint pulse, and it starts with getting angry, like the woman at the town hall meeting suggested. Until then, stop sending me the same old fundraising text messages and prove to me and others that you have a plan.

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about technology, media, and other topics for The Spy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

Susan and Barry Koh: A Tribute to Good Mid-Shore Neighbors Who Made a Difference by Hugh Panero

March 5, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

Next week, Barry and Susan Koh will depart Easton, leaving a legacy of what it means to be a good neighbor and community leader. This local power couple was instrumental in creating Temple B’Nai Israel, the spiritual center for the Jewish population in Talbot County. In addition to nurturing the spirit, they also nurtured our cultural needs with Chesapeake Music, which has presented world-class chamber music events and performances for many years, today with a residency at the Ebenezer Theater. 

The next time you attend B’Nai Israel services or social events, like the lecture series the Kohs helped create, or find yourself soaking in the sounds at a chamber music performance at the Ebenezer Theater in downtown – you can thank Barry and Susan.

Barry and Susan are good at many things, but most importantly, they know how to get things done. They are highly detail-oriented and have vision, which is a rare combination. They helped raise millions of dollars to build the Temple, which has been a vital place of worship; especially today, helping Jews and people of other faiths, make sense of the Israeli hostage crisis and war in Gaza.   

About 100 people recently attended an event at the Temple to show their gratitude and appreciation to the Kohs. Recently retired Rabbi Peter Hyman, who the Kohs recruited to become the first full-time Rabbi for the Temple many years ago, recited the Proverb, “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” He added, “The Kohs showed vision and dedication, and we are all better off because of their efforts.”  

Speaker after speaker described their dedication, how effectively Susan recruited new members to the Temple, and how Barry used common sense and an engineer’s scientific approach to problem-solving to move projects forward. Others talked about how the couple recruited and charmed talented people to become involved with the Temple and Chesapeake Music. The general theme was that saying no to Barry and Susan was hard. They are also forward-thinking, and with their departure in mind, helped create a succession plan ensuring that what they built over two decades would endure.

After an hour or so of people saying wonderful things about them, Barry and Susan got their chance to respond at the podium. In Barry’s familiar humorous and self-deprecating style, he opened his remarks saying, “Now for the Rebuttal,” generating laughter from the crowd. Barry and Susan went on to thank many people, talk about volunteerism, and how meaningful it was for them to be part of the Temple family over all these years. They also encouraged people to get involved. Barry and Susan are models of effective volunteer leadership and community involvement. 

The Kohs are a unique couple. They met when they were nine years old while attending camp. They have been married for 64 years and are best friends. Barry has NYC roots as I do. He attended the Bronx High School of Science and graduated from Columbia University with an AB in Science and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. He later got his Master’s degree from the University of Maryland in Mechanical Engineering and a PHD in Thermal Engineering, minoring in Nuclear Engineering from Cornell University. Based on his resume, I listened carefully whenever Barry explained how things worked. 

 

Barry served in the Navy on Admiral Rickover’s staff, described as the father of the US nuclear Navy. After several executive jobs in the nuclear industry, he formed Koh and Associates, a company that focused on radioactive waste management, euphemistically called environmental restoration. 

Susan had a 36-year career as a teacher and administrator. She attended Barnard College in NYC. When I asked her why Barnard, she told me with a twinkle in her eye that she needed to keep an eye on Barry, who was attending nearby Columbia. Susan’s teaching and administrative career included stints in Pittsburgh, Baltimore, and other places. Susan took time off to raise children and jumped into more volunteer work later in life. 

When deciding where to move two decades ago, Susan said she preferred moving to New York while Barry wanted to be on the Eastern Shore to enjoy fishing and boating. When I asked her about the move she said, “Barry was right. Easton was the right choice”. Susan’s only requirement was not to live on an isolated street, preferring a home where she could open her front door and yell “Help!” if needed, and someone would hear her. Well, for 16 years my wife and I have lived across the street from Susan and Barry and are one of the couples on our street who would happily respond.

There was never a call for help. Instead, I would call her for advice on various subjects. Our best conversations with Barry and Susan happened while walking our dog Ella. We would run into them on the street, driving back from one of their many meeting or Barry’s daily early morning swim at the Y. We talked about kids, politics, life, and neighborhood affairs. I will miss calling Barry to ask if his internet is down and to complain about the service. I will miss seeing Susan cleaning up her yard, which set a high standard for us, and watching Barry strut around in his cool Bronx High School Science bomber jacket. I will not miss my wife saying, “Why can’t you dress nicely like Barry.” I will also miss seeing Barry taking his pretty boat “Daybreak” out at sunrise for a long day of fishing with buddies; a few I imagine who could not say no to the invite. 

 

Susan and Barry are off to Rye, New York, where they will be closer to their children and grandchildren. They both say they will miss the caliber of people with whom they have developed friendships during their 19-year tenure in Easton. They will find new people and contribute their unique skills to making their new home a better place. I will miss them, as will all the people they have touched. 

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and Media and other stuff for the Spy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

The Death of TikTok by Hugh Panero

January 20, 2025 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

On Sunday evening, TikTok, the popular social media platform, was executed in the US. Since 2016, swiping through endless short-form videos on your smartphone customized to your tastes has been a guilty pleasure for 170 million active users in the US.

Screenshot

TikTok’s death may be short-lived. Trump announced on Sunday that he intends to bring the service back to life by executive order once he takes office to allow more time to find a 50 percent US investor.

TikTok uses a sophisticated recommendation engine algorithm that determines what content you like and lulls you into an addictive, viral, mindless stupor. Before you know it, minutes turned into hours.

After using the app for a long time in the bathroom, some users need help exiting due to trouble walking, and others experienced Carpal TikTok syndrome caused by excessive swiping (okay, I made that up). Others constantly bombarded family and friends with their favorite videos, whether they wanted to see them or not.

However, on Sunday, users were greeted with a message: “Sorry, TikTok isn’t available right now.” Adding, “we are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he takes office. Please stay tuned.” It is reported that the service is preparing to reinstate service after assurances there will be no repercussions.

TikTok burst onto the scene eight years ago, catching social media behemoths Meta (Facebook, Instagram) and Google by surprise. It became one of the hottest social media companies and created a new group of loyal, young, social media content creators and influencers.

My TikTok scrolling featured short movie clips (“You can’t handle the TRUTH”), videos of dogs, babies, and babies playing with dogs, professional comedy bits, and funny videos created by users. TikTok has a dark side. It contributed to our political chaos by spreading untruths like all the other major social media platforms. However, for the US government, the scariest thing about the platform is that it is owned by a Chinese company ByteDance.

Unfortunately for TikTok, its enormous popularity (2 billion+ active users worldwide), and murky Chinese ownership put a large target on its back. Mark Zuckerberg began stealing elements of TikTok and incorporated them into his Instagram platform to compete. The call to ban TikTok was one of the only issues Democrats and Republicans could agree on. In a bipartisan effort, in 2024, Congress passed legislation to ban TikTok unless a new owner could be found. The vote was 353-65 in the House and 79-18 in the Senate. And the other two branches of the government, the executive and judiciary branches, have supported and reaffirmed the legislation.

Sunday, January 19th was established as TikTok’s execution date, not by lethal injection but for an app just as bad —pulling the plug and shutting down the app. The bill was challenged in court. Even the Supreme Court got involved, quickly dismissing the argument that the legislation and ban infringed on TikTok user’s free speech.

It is acceptable for US citizens to give away all their data for free to greedy tech companies, but a line has now been drawn regarding having a relationship with Chinese spies. Years of being trained to let tech companies know everything about them has led many to shrug off the risk of a foreign tech platform having access to their data. The shutdown is especially painful to thousands of users who created businesses and make a living on the platform. Many also feel that targeting TikTok, regardless of the real risk of Chinese data mining and foreign propaganda influencing tens of millions of US citizens, is actually part of a US tech bro plan to eliminate a social media competitor and create a fire sale for the company.

TikTok fans with a sense of humor, anticipating the January 19 breakup deadline, flooded the site with romantic goodbyes from or to their Chinese Spies, with Whitney Houston singing “I will always love you” in the background and other variations on the breakup theme.

TikTok’s competitors spent millions convincing politicians on both sides of the aisle to ban TikTok. Tech billionaires like Musk and Zuckerberg also made personal appeals to their newest BFF, Trump. Ironically, it was only a few years ago that US tech companies were angrily grilled by Congress for pushing untruths about the 2016 election, among other issues, and threatened with regulations that never happened. TikTok offered the perfect Chinese villain to deflect attention away from them. It also helps that the tech billionaire class is throwing millions at Trump, kissing the ring with front-row seats at the January 20 inauguration. How times have changed?

Trump has dramatically changed his position on TikTok. In 2020, he aggressively called for its ban due to National Security concerns. Now, he wants to facilitate its resurrection. More recently, he suggested the Supreme Court hold off banning TikTok to let him find a US buyer. His attitude change coincided with his effective use of social media and its biggest stars like Joe Rogan (Trump has 14 million TikTok followers) to win the White House. So why kill such a valuable political weapon that the Democrats are so pathetic at using? The Democrats, seeing Trump’s recent maneuvering to be TikTok’s savior, now also support a shutdown postponement. It’s stuff like this that makes you hate politicians.

Lastly, Trump’s billionaire buddies have voiced interest in buying TikTok, and Jeff Yass, a GOP mega-donor, owns a significant share of TikTok’s parent, ByteDance. Another billionaire, Frank McCourt, and Project America, think TikTok is worth $20 billion and want to buy it despite the fact you are not buying the algorithm that is the heart of the service, just the US operations. The Chinese appear unwilling to part with that intellectual property and are not racing to sell. The Chinese may like the idea of the US banning a media platform after years of being criticized for their heavy-handed censorship and control of all media touching their citizens.

Products have been banned in the US for decades for public health reasons but not a social media app for national security concerns. All I wanted was a few videos of dogs being sweet to babies. I guess I will have to get my fix somewhere else.

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and Media and other stuff for the Spy.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Hugh

Dogs rule despite who wins this election by Hugh Panero

November 6, 2024 by Hugh Panero Leave a Comment

It will be a tough week for everyone, and I can no longer think or talk about politics. I would rather discuss dogs and why I like them more than most humans. In these challenging times, we can learn a lot from our canine pals, such as unconditional love, persevering through hard times, living in the moment, the pleasure of a good meal, loyalty, and the benefits of having no sense of time.  

Instead of catastrophizing the outcome of this election, find a friendly dog to play with, whatever side you are on, because life will go on, and dog escapism is healthy. I intend to spend more time with my dog, Ella Fitzgerald, a white Whoodle who is part Wheaton Terrier and Poodle.

Ella is relentless. All she wants to do is play frisbee, and I am happy to turn off the TV, leave my iPhone on the table, and toss a few. If you have a pulse, you can join us. All humans are welcome. She will place her red frisbee at your feet and slowly back up, preparing for a long toss. It is 45 minutes of not thinking about the outcome in Pennsylvania.  

Ella provides this service to all. I regularly look out my window and see her red frisbee floating by, tossed by the UPS or Fedex guy, a landscaper, plumber, electrician, or one of the many others who come to my home. They are seduced by Ella’s impressive vertical leap and joy as she snatches the frisbee out of the air, completing the human-dog aerial partnership.

I once saw my neighbor Mike on his bike, slowly rolling by our property. With Ella’s frisbee secured in her mouth, she tracked him behind our invisible fence like a diligent border patrol agent. My dog-savvy neighbor, understanding the security protocol, dismounted, crossed the invisible fence onto my property, and played with her for half an hour. 

I am all in on our dog. I lower her car window so she can stick her head out, even if it’s freezing outside, and I toss her treats for no reason. Acquiring a Pup Cup is part of our ritual, and at my daughter’s wedding, we even offered signature drinks named after our dogs. The “Ella Fitzgerald” was a Spicy Paloma.

Each morning, Ella jumps onto our bed and belly crawls to me or my wife for a morning scratch. If we do not comply because we are sleeping or pretending to be asleep, she will nudge her cold, wet nose under one of our hands to press the point. We eventually comply.

My relationship with Ella can be humbling. During our morning walk, she occasionally has difficulty completing her number two evacuation and stares at me with a pathetic look, asking for assistance. I check her back door, and inexplicably, I find myself pulling grass out of her butt using one of my doggy bags. I laugh at myself, my inner voice saying, “You used to run a media company, and now you’re pulling grass out of your dog’s ass.”  And I am ok with that. 

Ella is all love, and returning it in kind to her and your other human or dog friends will help you live longer. She has few bad qualities. Ella does not beg for food or chew on stray socks. She does gently sticks her snout in everyone’s crotch for a head scratch, catching a few humans off guard. Her periodic barking is designed to warn us about murderous squirrels, foxes, and the occasional deer that wander onto our property. She is very trusting and enthusiastically bolts into the vet or groomer, looking for affection, blissfully ignorant of prior bad experiences. If only humans could harness this skill. 

She was not bothered when hearing false reports of immigrants eating cats and dogs in Springfield, Ohio. She knew it was BS. She is terrified by the low-battery chirping sound from one of many smoke detectors. We are usually asleep, and upon hearing it, she flies into our bedroom and stands on my chest, shaking, her tiny tail in the “danger” pose. My wife quickly takes her outside while I hunt for the chirping culprit with a replacement 9 Volt battery and a ladder in hand, wondering if I will survive the climb—anything for Ella.  

Instagram and TikTok have also incorporated my love for dogs into their customized algorithms. My content stream is filled with cute dogs playing with babies (the tech companies know about my new grandson, Zev). To keep me hooked, they send me videos of dogs at the airport waiting for their soldier human to return from an extended tour of duty. The dog loses it when their best friend in camo shows up. The most recent gut-wrenching video was about a sickly man who had been battling cancer for a year, losing over 60 lbs. When he reunited with his dog, the animal did not recognize him at first and barked at him for a few minutes until the dog’s smell superpower identified who he was and then overwhelmed him with affection.    

I rely on my extensive dog friend network to help me cope during these ugly times. There is Diasy, an energetic chocolate Lab who lives up the street and visits regularly. Upon seeing me, she accelerates from zero to 20 mph pretty fast, and before you know it, I am covered with licks and hit with lab body bumps. Another dog pal from the hood is Remy, an older, heavyset Lab who does not like other dogs but loves me (or at least I think so). Remy provides relief from any bad news day. My next-door neighbor’s dogs include Cassie and Huck. They showed up the other day, emerging from the bushes, sensing my need for companionship with Election Day approaching. All these dogs remember my history of treat-giving. If I am not outside, the dogs sit outside my front door and wait for treats. 

My newest dog friends, Scruffy and Casey, are small Aussie Doodles. They are brilliant and direct. Scruffy bangs on a small bell to signal when he wants to go out, and when Casey sees me, she drops onto her back and sticks her leg up in the air, beckoning for a belly rub. She is a tad forward, but I comply. All my dog friends are reflections of their human patrons. You can tell a lot of people by meeting their dogs.

A dog is your best friend for part of your life, but you are their best friend for their entire lives.    

I miss my daughter’s dogs, Frankie and Otis (Ella’s half-brother), who moved from DC to the West Coast a few years ago. I helped raise Otis; clearly, this grumpy, judgmental fellow spent too much time with me.

When we go to Seattle to visit my daughter, son-in-law, and grandson, one of the highlights is the crazy happiness displayed when these dogs realize who we are despite living on opposite coasts. I also miss my dog pals who have passed away, like Dexter, Biddie, Dizzy, Anebel, Lizzie, and Maxie, to name a few.    

Unlike politicians, dogs do not switch parties, lie, or suddenly turn on those who love and support them. So, if you’re having a tough time at this moment in history, find a great dog to play with or come to my house, pick up Ella’s red frisbee, and toss it high and long.

Hugh Panero, a tech and media entrepreneur, was the founder and former CEO of XM Satellite Radio. He has worked with leading tech venture capital firms and was an adjunct media professor at George Washington University. He writes about Tech and Media and other stuff for the Spy. 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2026

Affiliated News

  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

Sections

  • Sample Page

Spy Community Media

  • Sample Page
  • Subscribe
  • Sample Page

Copyright © 2026 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in