MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • Education
  • Donate to the Centreville Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Spy Community Media
    • Chestertown Spy
    • Talbot Spy
    • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
March 11, 2026

Centreville Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Centreville

  • Home
  • Education
  • Donate to the Centreville Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Spy Community Media
    • Chestertown Spy
    • Talbot Spy
    • Cambridge Spy
1 Homepage Slider Point of View Laura

Lessons in Navigation by Laura J. Oliver 

June 18, 2023 by Laura J. Oliver Leave a Comment

My father painted the entire exterior of our two-story house by himself one summer. From inside the house, it was disconcerting to have his head suddenly appear at an upstairs window, as if the laws of physics had changed for a season.

“Come! Quick!” he yelled one afternoon scrambling down the ladder with a wet brush in hand.

Stormy was barking, plunging about in the unmown grass. The dog had discovered an enormous turtle, her shell 18 inches across, making her way from the woods, edging our yard, down to the marsh. As we gathered around, Dad leaned over her with the brush and in two deft strokes, painted a large white X on her back. “There!” he said, “If we see her again, we’ll recognize her.” The turtle blinked, unfazed, then resumed her slow lurching journey down to the marsh, utterly unaware of her new identity. 

This is the season years ago that my identity changed too, from young mother with a living father to young mother whose father had died alone in the night in his Florida condominium. Upon hearing the news, I immediately thought of the last time we’d talked—checking in to see if it was a good place to leave a relationship for eternity. I was lucky. It was. 

My father died somewhat young, although it was many years after he left to start a new life, and our feelings about him were mixed. He exemplified the Mad Men lifestyle of the sixties—hard drinking, hard smoking, hard-partying, and I was afraid of his often-violent, volatile discipline.

Yet he also was first to help stranded motorists, remodeled a farmhouse kitchen for his dying mother-in-law, had the resourcefulness to build a house from a barn, crafted heirloom doll furniture for my sisters, made replicas of antiques for our mother because she loved them, and was for a time, the administrative director of a children’s hospital. 

Here’s what I’ve learned about that paradox. You get to choose how you remember someone. You get to choose where on the continuum of someone’s character to place your attention. It’s all your experience, but what memory serves you? 

So, the issue for his daughters, ambivalent and 970 miles away, was how to say goodbye. He had wanted his ashes spread in the Chesapeake, but that’s illegal. If anyone knows. 

To honor his wishes, we had them sent up from Bradenton, and my sisters and I gathered in Virginia Beach. Our plan was to charter a yacht with a sympathetic captain, order wine and appetizers from a caterer, and cast off at sunset on a course for the mouth of the bay. The weather was perfect, and we powered out and out until we were so far from land the shore was another country.

As we drifted over solid ground, each of us shared a story about Dad that the others might not know. For me, it was the day Dad told me I had to memorize the 23rd Psalm. I was eight. We sat on the back porch steps in the afternoon sun, and he recited the words over and over. “The Lord is my Shepherd; I shall not want.” It is, to this day, the only Psalm I know by heart. Had something happened? Was I being given tools, armament to cope with his leaving a year later? I’ll never know.

After my sisters shared their memories, we sang the Navy hymn, Eternal Father Strong to Save, and gently poured his ashes overboard where the last storm of him swirled in a cloudy vortex, then sank with the sun into the sea. To mark the spot, we dropped white carnation blossoms on the waves.

Each of us found a place to be alone with our thoughts as we powered back in. I was proud of us. Grateful. Despite our ambivalence, we had created a beautiful, loving, genuine, and respectful ceremony. I imagined he was pleased, but as we skimmed over the bay and night’s curtain fell, I felt suddenly overwhelmed with loss. It was the only time I have cried for my father. I was once told that you cannot love someone you fear, but that person can still be important to you, and now he was gone. 

In truth, the tears weren’t for him but for the finality. All you know for certain that you will ever have with another person–is what you already have, but until they die, there’s an imperceptible hope that something more is possible. So, that evening my identity changed again, this time to someone newly aware of another dimension of grief. I cried not for him but for potential-him, the man who had run out of time.

My sister found me and asked what I was thinking, and I told her. It was hard to hear each other in the wind. She put her arms around me, and as we stood together, flying towards shore, another memory surfaced. 

My father sits in the stern of a wooden rowboat, a capable brown-haired, blue-eyed man in his thirties, with his youngest daughter, who is six, by his side. It is dusk, and we have been exploring secret creeks and hidden coves, drifting in the song of the whippoorwills. Honeysuckle, seaweed and saltwater scent the air. As the dying light coalesces, he restarts the outboard, pulls the tiller towards him, and spins us towards home. We accelerate into the night, and the stern sinks as the bow rises. Then the boat planes, and we skim toward lights that candle the horizon as if stars have fallen from heaven. In memory, once again, the laws of physics have changed for a season. 

I can’t hear my father speak unless I turn my head sideways. The rush of air whips his words into the night. I’m unprepared, therefore, when he puts my hand on the tiller, scooting over on the seat to let me steer. Stunned to be guiding the boat by myself, I see the entrance to our cove and, in the distance, our pier. I keep the bow aimed precisely, my whole being locked on our landmark, as if we might fly off the edge of the world should I fail. 

He nods at the channel markers, where their lights rock in the current, leans down against the wind, and speaks directly into my ear. “Keep green to starboard going out of the cove, but red on your right going in.” I squeeze my eyes shut to memorize these instructions, then over-correct the tiller, and the boat swings wide. I look up at him, panicked at my mistake, but he redirects our course with a smile. 

He has not left us yet. He has not taught me the 23rd Psalm. He has no idea these are the words I’ll remember when I’m grown and a mother, long after I’m the age he is now. He cups my face, so I’ll understand him and repeats himself calmly. 

“You’ll never be lost on the river, even someday when you’re on your own. Just remember green to starboard going out, red-right-returning to find your way home.” 

Laura J. Oliver is an award-winning developmental book editor and writing coach, who has taught writing at the University of Maryland and St. John’s College. She is the author of The Story Within (Penguin Random House). Co-creator of The Writing Intensive at St. John’s College, she is the recipient of a Maryland State Arts Council Individual Artist Award in Fiction, an Anne Arundel County Arts Council Literary Arts Award winner, a two-time Glimmer Train Short Fiction finalist, and her work has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Her website can be found here.

 

      

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 1 Homepage Slider, Laura

From and Fuller: Trump Indictments Round 2 and Saying No to No Label Candidates in 2024

June 15, 2023 by Al From and Craig Fuller Leave a Comment

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss the impact of former president Donald Trump’s second indictment on the Republican party and current GOP presidential candidates. Al and Craig also discuss their opinion piece in the Washington Post this week discussing the real threat posed by the No Labels movement and a third party run in 2024.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last five years, where now serves on the boards of the Academy Art Museum, the Benedictine School, and Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: From and Fuller, Spy Highlights

And Counting by Angela Rieck

June 15, 2023 by Angela Rieck Leave a Comment

There is a new documentary about the “19 Kids and Counting” family. Not surprisingly, this document opens the curtains on the Duggar family to reveal it to be as real as the Wizard of Oz.

I wonder if anyone is surprised. I am not. I had been told about this show when it first aired (and was “17 Kids and Counting”). People marveled at how well behaved the children were and how everyone pitched in without complaining.

I knew better. I grew up in a large family. Well, not 17+ kids; but I was one of six children. And I learned one thing. Normal children bicker, cry, have temper tantrums, lie, manipulate, compete, and refuse to do chores. The behavior the Duggar children exhibited could only occur under strenuous and punitive authoritarianism.

The goal of the IBLT Christian cult to which the Duggar’s belong is to produce a large army of God-fearing children. Their mission is for the children to work, vote, and run for public office with the goal of building an impenetrable Christian nation.

It was clear to me that these children’s spirits had been broken. They were harshly punished with spankings for any deviation. Sometimes implements were used, and they were spanked more if they cried. After a spanking, the child was required to thank the parent for the humiliation and promise to be better.

One of the more egregious punishments was called “blanket training.” At 6 months of age, Mommy Duggar placed her baby on a blanket with their favorite toy just outside the blanket. Each time the baby tried to reach for the toy, he was smacked. This would continue until he stopped trying to grasp the toy. It was repeated until the child finally learned to follow orders and stay away from his favorite toy.

Once a baby was weaned, it were assigned to one of the girls, who would be responsible for its care and training 24/7. They were all homeschooled in Bible teachings.

By modern standards, this seems like a harsh way to raise a child. Modern parenting is focused on giving children freedom and opportunities to learn about the world, other people, and themselves.

But while Duggar’s methods are harsh, they do not deviate much from childrearing in the past. A hundred years ago families were much larger. The unavailability of birth control, the need for child labor, Catholicism, Orthodox religions, and culture dictated these large families. Children were a vital part of the family unit: girls had to care for babies, boys helped their fathers, farm children worked in the fields, and some city children worked in factories.

I am grateful that I grew up in a large family. We had a lot more responsibilities than children in smaller households. My sisters and I learned cooking, sewing, canning, gardening, and homemaking.

But most importantly: we learned that we were not special. We were a part of a unit. We learned that if we exercised individual needs, those needs took from the other family members. We learned this not through authoritarianism but through peer pressure.

It is great training for life. It gave me empathy, helped me learn how to fit in, taught me how to love people who are different from me, taught me a higher purpose than self, and has given me lifetime friends. My family. We are best friends and a bedrock of support. When one of us stumbles, five people and their spouses jump in to support…it is a foundation like no other.

But these lessons came at a cost. We fought, we bickered, we created cabals, we argued, we lied, we yelled, we hit each other, we destroyed someone else’s property, someone stole the largest jar in the kiddie pool and when it was time to bring in the toys, tried to bring in the smaller one (my version of just punishment for that infraction was to hit her hard enough to break her collarbone). (Sis, you know who you are.)

When we heard thuds emanating from our brothers’ room, we knew that they were fighting and let them work it out. Eventually, the boys would divide their bedroom in half, one would get the door and the other window. There were winners and losers. As one of my brothers says, “I don’t know how he did it, but my brother always made me feel like I got the worse half of the room.”

The point is, our eventual closeness didn’t happen through authoritarianism, it was from learning that the price to be paid for not getting along was too high.

And our closeness has extended to our children. Affectionately called “the cousins,” they swarm together, play games, gossip, watch each other’s children, and revel in the joy of being together.

As for the Duggars, I know that raising 19 children the way that we were raised would be chaos. So, the only practical method is an extreme domination style of parenting, much like the military, which must break down its recruits to create obedience.

A disadvantage to growing up in a large family is that it causes you to have less self-regard and self-care. For example, none of us tolerate (or empathize) with illness. Because when one child was ill, everyone suffered. I was a sickly child and spent most autumns in the hospital with pneumonia. And it was a terrible drain on everyone else. Our mother would have to take precious time to visit me in the hospital. Effectively, a large family is a zero sum game, the time she spent with me, she couldn’t spend with her other five children. If I was sick, we had to cancel plans. So, we learned that illness vas verboten.

While my family was not harsh like the Duggar family, we did have to follow rules. Today, psychologists refer to this parenting style as authoritarian. Research shows that children in authoritarian situations have lower self-esteem. While they are typically obedient and proficient, they have lower scores for happiness and social competence. They are better liars, as they have learned to lie to avoid harsh punishment. In smaller families, there are more resources, parent/children relationships are more intimate, and parents can be involved in their children’s lives.

As much as I loved being in a large family, with the population crisis, it is irresponsible to have one now. Someone who wants that experience today has to be creative.

My nieces have solved the problem flawlessly. They live in close proximity to each other and whenever possible share parenting. Each has two children, and they get together frequently. Their children view each other as siblings, with all of the squabbles that come with it. Each child feels comfortable putting his or her head on an aunt or uncle’s shoulder for comfort. The three families act as a unit. And as other cousin families expand, they are welcomed into the fold. Their children will learn to play together, different ages, different genders, different capabilities. Building lifelong relationships. It is beautiful to watch.

So, it is actually better than our circumstances. There are six kids of different ages and genders, sharing, fighting, and caring about each other. Instead of two, there are six parents to wipe away tears, guide, and love them.

Everyone wins.

Angela Rieck, a Caroline County native, received her PhD in Mathematical Psychology from the University of Maryland and worked as a scientist at Bell Labs, and other high-tech companies in New Jersey before retiring as a corporate executive. Angela and her dogs divide their time between St Michaels and Key West Florida. Her daughter lives and works in New York City.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Angela

Unapologetic, Dangerous Trump by J.E. Dean

June 14, 2023 by J.E. Dean Leave a Comment

Last week’s indictment of Donald Trump for felonies associated with his misappropriation of government documents was no surprise.  When Attorney General Garland appointed an aggressive, experienced prosecutor, Jack Smith, as Special Counsel to investigate the case as well as Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021, insurrection, we knew indictment was only a matter of time.  The first federal indictment dropped on June 8.  The second, more serious indictment, likely charging Trump with conspiracy for sedition, will follow before summer ends.

Since the documents indictment was unsealed, we are learning more about Trump (as if there is anything not yet known about him) and the danger he creates for American democracy.  We also are learning that Trump’s legal problems are bringing out the worst in many of us, especially Republicans.

Did you watch any of Trump’s campaign rallies in Georgia and North Carolina.  Or his comments after the arraignment where he called prosecutor Jack Smith “deranged” and said he looks like a thug?  Trump is wholly unapologetic and dismisses the documents indictment as a “witch hunt” and evidence of the deep state to get him.  The audiences in both Georgia and North Carolina applauded this. Trump also claimed his poll numbers and donations have increased since the indictment.  Could that be true?  Trump issued fund raising appeals referencing the indictment within two hours after the news broke.

Trump is described in some quarters as deeply concerned about the indictment.  He should be. He allowed himself to be recorded admitting that documents he was showing to unauthorized persons were classified and that he had not declassified them.  That is why Jack Smith indicted Trump for lying to the government as well as violating the Espionage Act.

Is it possible that Trump believes a public outcry over his indictments will help his defense?  That appears to be the case, which is why Trump and various loyal followers (and, surprisingly, some challenging him for the 2024 Republican nomination) are doing their best to cry “unequal justice,” portraying Trump as a victim.  It’s enough to induce vomiting.

It we are seeing the heart of Trump’s defense in the form of the claim that he can’t be indicted because he is running for president and because the “Biden crime family” and Hillary Clinton remain free, the end of Trump’s political career, and maybe his personal freedom, is nearing.  Cross your fingers—your own freedom to live in a democracy may depend on it.

Trump’s reaction to his indictment is noteworthy, but so too are the reactions of others.  Here are two notable ones:

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, described as a potential presidential candidate or 2024 running mate, decried the indictment as evidence of a two-tiered system of justice.  He tweeted: “Regardless of your party, this [the indictment of Trump] undermines faith in our judicial system at exactly the time when we should be working to restore that trust.”

That bizarre comment—suggesting that the indictment of someone who a grand jury found likely to have committed felonies (37 in the indictment) should not be prosecuted—tells you a lot about who Glenn Youngkin is.

We also saw Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC), once a respected legislator, melt down on the George Stephanopoulos program on Sunday as he tried to defend Trump by talking about Hillary Clinton’s computer server. Stephanopoulos tried to interrupt Graham’s disingenuous tirade.  Graham lost his temper and pleaded, “Let me finish!”  The interview was pathetic.

Trump isn’t going down easy, but, with luck, hard work on the part of prosecutors, and the triumph of justice, Trump’s future is grim.

J.E. Dean is a retired attorney and public affairs consultant writing on politics, government, and other subjects.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Op-Ed, Opinion

 Depression: Real Drama by Howard Freedlander

June 13, 2023 by Howard Freedlander Leave a Comment

Continuing our pandemic behavior in 2023, my wife and I recently watched a wrenching Netflix film, “Son,” starring Hugh Jackman, Laura Dern and Vanessa Kirby. The subject was disabling depression and unwavering sadness.

The plot is simple. A 17-year-old is consumed by hopelessness and anger in the wake of his parents’ divorce. His fragile emotional state continues to worsen, including self-mutilation. The sense of abandonment is palpable, paralyzing the son with grief and disassociation from school and friends. His father and mother try to understand their uncommunicative son.

To no avail.

Critics will say that the rest of the story is predictable, thus diminishing the quality of the movie. I disagree.

The possibility of suicide is disturbingly real. Whether the film is considered too melodramatic, manipulating the audience’s feelings, is a perspective that is irrelevant.

Parents, grandparents and friends cannot ignore the signs of depression. Over the years, I have become increasingly aware of this disease —and saddened. In six instances, I have learned about suicide committed by young men on the road to supposedly personal and professional success. They surprised loved ones and friends by taking their precious lives.

I think, for example, about the sons of Senator Ben Cardin and Rep. Jamie Raskin, as well as the son of an Easton friend. I try to imagine the pain that prompted these six young men to end their lives. Then, I focus on the overwhelming grief that must engulf the parents and siblings.

An awful void besets the family. Forever. “Son” brings home the overriding need for parental attention. Denial is dangerous. After a suicide attempt, the cinematic parents finally accept a terrible reality, as their son is treated for mental illness at a New York hospital. Unfortunately, they ignore wise medical advice to confine their son temporarily in the hospital. They yield to their son’s manipulative pleas to go home.

I likely have delved too deeply in details regarding the movie. Its impact was significant for me. It dealt with a troubling issue.

Depression and its potentially fatal effect have gained more visibility in recent years. Suicide by gifted young people has drawn justifiable visibility and concern. It no longer is the silent killer.

Adolescence is a fraught time. Aberrant behavior and thoughts may seem normal during a “bad patch.” In fact, they are serious and searing.

Like the parents in “Son,” those in the real world wrestle with conflicting emotions. They may tend to believe their teenaged children simply need to “get on” with their young lives, putting demons aside. It would be easy to consider their children as self-absorbed.

That posture would be ill-advised.

“Son” is worth seeing. It is difficult at times. It drives home the message that parenting is complicated, requiring tough love at times and informed compassion at other times. Psychiatric help not only is vital, it is unquestionably necessary.

Intended as a movie review, this column has veered toward discussion of depression. I have no insight about the impact of depression, other than what I have read, heard and observed. Its path to suicide in some cases concerns me; young people have decided they cannot live with sadness, lack of purpose and chronic desperation.

“Son” is not a cheerful film. It entertains in a somber way. It teaches in a meaningful way.

Columnist Howard Freedlander retired in 2011 as Deputy State Treasurer of the State of Maryland. Previously, he was the executive officer of the Maryland National Guard. He also served as community editor for Chesapeake Publishing, lastly at the Queen Anne’s Record-Observer. After 44 years in Easton, Howard and his wife, Liz, moved in November 2020 to Annapolis, where they live with Toby, a King Charles Cavalier Spaniel who has no regal bearing, just a mellow, enticing disposition.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Howard

Kirkie by Jamie Kirkpatrick

June 13, 2023 by Jamie Kirkpatrick Leave a Comment

As we approach Father’s Day, I find myself thinking about my own father. He has been gone nearly thirty-six years now so there are some shadows in my memory, but all in all, he’s still there: quiet, kind and gentle; generous to the point of indulgent; resolute, dutiful but always humble; honest and trustworthy. A man at peace with himself and the world around him.

He was born on New Year’s Eve,1906 in his family’s clapboard home in Renfrew, a tiny dot on the map in western Pennsylvania. He was a young boy when his family—he was the youngest of seven children—moved a few miles over the mountain to Butler, an only slightly larger dot on the map. He graduated from Allegheny College, then somehow made the momentous leap to Harvard Law School. In 1932, by then with my mother at his side, he returned to Pittsburgh to start his law career. A few years later when the the war began, he joined the Army and moved his young family (mother and my three older siblings) to Washington where he helped to plan the invasion of Japan that (thankfully) never occurred.

Following the war, he returned to Pittsburgh, started his own practice, now the mega international firm of KL Gates. When I arrived on the scene in 1948, he was already 41 (mother was a year older), so I was raised as the caboose of the family train, a fact of my life with its own set of distinct advantages and disadvantages. The good news was that I often had my parents to myself, but there were times when my siblings were away at school that I often felt a bit lonely and left behind. Still, my childhood memories are bright.

My father and I were close, up to a point. We played golf together and often went to Forbes Field to watch the Pirates play baseball. As I entered my teens, I grew restless and because my siblings were all out of the nest, I thought I should be, too. So I went to boarding school, another fact of my life with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. I loved the connections I forged at school, but at the same time, I severed my connections to Pittsburgh. Way led on to way—college, Peace Corps, my career in Washington—and so the hills and rivers of my hometown faded away to be replaced by the great world beyond. I stayed in touch with my parents, and from time to time visited them at High Meadow, their cherished weekend retreat in the Laurel Highlands, but I watched them grow old from afar.

My father’s health began to decline. He died in 1987 at the age of 81. These days that’s relatively “young,” but even more worrisome to me is the fact that I’m closing in on that very horizon. I know nothing is writ in stone, but the mile markers come more quickly now and I wonder if my father felt the same quickening pace, too.

I never called my father “Dad.” I don’t remember how I addressed him when I was a little boy, but later on, I do remember calling him “Pappy” from time-to-time. When his first grandchild arrived (I was only 6 at the time), she had the honor of bestowing his grandfather name. It was “Kirkie” and forever after, that’s what we all called him.

The territory of fathers and sons is a mysterious island, steeped in the mists of time. Its coastline has plenty of safe coves and rocky shoals, high cliffs and sandy beaches. I know that no father is perfect, but I was blessed. My father was a good and admirable man, worthy of emulation. I live in his shadow.

I’ll be right back.

Jamie Kirkpatrick is a writer and photographer who lives in Chestertown. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Washington College Alumni Magazine, and American Cowboy Magazine. His new novel “This Salted Soil,” a new children’s book, “The Ballad of Poochie McVay,” and two collections of essays (“Musing Right Along” and “I’ll Be Right Back”), are available on Amazon. Jamie’s website is Musingjamie.net.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Jamie

Where Are All the Serious People? By Maria Grant

June 12, 2023 by Maria Grant Leave a Comment

A proclamation from the mogul and family patriarch Logan Roy to his children in the HBO series Succession is, “I love you, but you are not serious people.” I have been thinking about how many people in the public domain today are not serious people—that is to say, you can’t take them seriously. They have become almost caricatures of who they aim to be. 

Truth be told, I find this revelation about the preponderance of unserious people disturbing. How is it that so many people who have substantive positions or are celebrities in the constant spotlight have gone off the deep end? 

Here is a random list of people who are difficult to take seriously in no particular order.

George Santos. An imaginative novelist could not dream up this character who is a Republican congressman from Long Island, NY. How did this guy get elected? He lied about where he went to high school and college. He lied about his religion. He lied about working on Wall Street. He lied about founding an animal charity. He lied about claiming that his mother’s death was related to 9/11. In short, he has lied about pretty much everything. He is the least serious person in Congress today—and that says a lot. It is beyond bizarre that this guy roams the hallowed halls of the Capitol building. 

Marjorie Taylor Greene. The congresswoman from Georgia has said January 6 protestors have had their rights “fragrantly violated,” has lied about the definition of Critical Race Theory, has called a petri dish a “peach tree” dish, and has referred to the “gazpacho police,” and “wonton killings.”  And that, fellow reader, is the tip of the iceberg.

Josh Hawley. It’s hard for me to get off my Josh Hawley soapbox. A Republican Senator from Missouri, who writes a book called Manhood, fist pumps January 6 Capitol insurrectionists, and when he finds himself in danger after the Capitol break-in becomes deadly serious, scurries away, tripping over people in an effort to run for cover. 

Ron DeSantis. The current governor of Florida and Republican contender for the 2024 presidential nomination, has already become somewhat of a caricature. This governor has taken on the so-called “woke” mob, banned books in schools, and then taken on Disney for its inclusive approach to hiring. And folks, we have only just begun.   

J Lo and Ben Affleck. Like many other movie stars, they claim to be strong environmentalists.  Within the last month, they purchased a 38,000 square foot $60 million mansion in Beverly Hills. That’s right, 38,000 square feet.  How environmentally sound is that?  How big is that carbon footprint? Obviously, it’s great to have a nice pad when you have tons of money, but does any family require 38,000 square feet?  Call me crazy, but would 19,000 square feet suffice?  And, by the way, they own more than one home.

Kanye West. This rapper recently legally changed his name to Ye with no middle or last name. Ye once claimed that his greatest regret was not being able to see himself perform live. And he said he is too busy writing history to read it. My case rests.

Johnny Depp. Many claim he is an extremely talented actor. That may be so, but during the Amber Heard trial he admitted to painting on walls with the blood from his finger. In earlier days, he also admitted to spending $5 million blasting Hunter S. Thompson’s ashes from a cannon.   

Lauren Boebert. A Republican Congresswoman from Colorado, Boebert’s Christmas card features her four young sons holding semi-automatic rifles in front of the Christmas tree. She has made several anti-Muslim and anti LGBTQ+ remarks. During Biden’s State of the Union speech, she heckled him and turned her back on the Cabinet. She promotes family values, but her husband, who recently filed for divorce, once exposed his private parts in a bar the couple owned. 

Robert Kennedy Jr. He is the only Democrat to date to announce that he is running against Joe Biden in the next election. While getting kudos for his work as an environmental lawyer, he has drawn sharp criticism for his promotion of conspiracy theories, for his anti-vaccine stance, for his claim that Bill Gates was pro-vaccine so he could make more money, and who equated Dr. Fauci with fascism and claimed that Fauci was in the pocket of big pharma. When his book The Real Anthony Fauci was published, Fauci called it, “a complete lie.” He has also claimed that federal health officials conspired with the Chinese to hide the pandemic’s origins. Many in his own family refuse to support his candidacy. 

Mark Zuckerberg. His accomplishments are beyond impressive. He is the CEO of Facebook (and now its parent company Meta) and has donated billions of dollars to medical research. He became the world’s youngest self-made billionaire at age 23. His net worth is estimated at $85 billion. He has, for many years, been described as “quirky.” At one time, he challenged himself to eat meat only if he killed it himself. He said he wanted to be more connected to the food and the animals that give their lives so that he could eat them. He wore a tie to work every day for a whole year to prove to his employees he was a serious person. His power is complicated because, as he has claimed when testifying in Congress, if he controls content, he becomes even more powerful. He has a history of apologizing—mostly about misinformation posted on Facebook. And he has repeatedly apologized to users to whom he promised that their information would remain private. He then repeatedly allowed it to be made public. 

Rudy Giuliani.  Once “America’s mayor,” this guy has clearly fallen from grace. His appearance in Borat 2 will live in infamy. He peddled disinformation relentlessly after the 2020 election. He recently was accused of sexual assault. And who can forget his stellar performance on the Masked Singer or seeing hair dye dripping down his face during a press conference when he claimed election interference?

Aaron Rodgers.  I must admit that after living in Green Bay for two years, I became a Green Bay Packers fan and have watched Rodgers play too many games to count. He is a great quarterback—no doubt about it. But he has gotten increasingly weird.  He was weird about the vaccine (immunized not vaccinated). Weird about unconventional methods of self-reflection and mind-altering drugs. And most recently weird when he decided to decide his football future by going to a four-day sensory-deprivation total darkness retreat in a hobbit-like structure called a “sky cave.”

Lindsey Graham. The Republican senator from South Carolina is the ultimate flip-flop man. Once best friends with republican Arizona Senator, John McCain, Graham’s backtracks on issues are too numerous to count. When Graham was running for president against Trump, his distaste for the man was off the charts. He said he didn’t even vote for him in the 2016 election but instead voted for a third-party candidate. How times have changed! He is now Trump’s major wingman and ultimate toady. He has stated that if Trump gets indicted, there will be violence in the streets—in a sense encouraging another insurrection. 

Donald Trump. He is my last example. He is a liar, a cheat—the ultimate grifter. Where Graham is a flip-flop man, Trump is a flim-flam man. He is not a serious person. And when president, he made no effort to fill his cabinet with serious people. He certainly made no effort to do a deep dive and promote America’s policies and priorities. Instead, he made a mockery of pretty much every American institution. 

The big question is why is this happening? Why do we idolize these people? Why do we settle for mediocrity and worse?  Many psychologists opine that Americans are going through an identity crisis. We don’t know who we are or who we want to be. So, what do we do? We glom onto people’s points of view who are constantly in the news. Psychologists theorize that we use these people as some kind of life raft to hold onto. Also, over the last few decades, many people have achieved fame without exhibiting any real talent or expertise—think social media mavens like the Kardashians.  With the rise of social media, we find ourselves wanting to be entertained as opposed to being educated—hence the rise of Donald Trump. Unfortunately, our quest for competence and expertise has been kicked to the curb.  

Where have all the serious people gone? Let’s hope and pray, to quote Peter, Paul, and Mary, not to “graveyards every one.” When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?

Maria Grant was principal-in-charge of a federal human capital practice at an international consulting firm. While on the Eastern Shore, she focuses on writing, music, reading, gardening, and nature. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed, Opinion

Walking to Mexico by Laura J. Oliver

June 11, 2023 by Laura J. Oliver Leave a Comment

Every time you remember an event, your brain replaces the original memory with a new version, one that is slightly altered by the impact of all you’ve experienced between the last time you remembered the event and now. The new memory is, therefore, never exactly the same as the old, which is why memories can’t be trusted for accuracy. Family stories in particular, are told and retold until all you can count on is the emotional truth. Which is why this story, while real, may not be true.

My father has bought a Volkswagen bug and he is driving our family from Maryland to Florida to visit my grandparents who live on the Gulf of Mexico. My mother and I wait in the car with my sisters: 11 and 14. I am six. Apparently, no knucklehead left the water running or a window open, so my father locks the front door and gets in the car.

As he starts the engine, I regard my family breathing the same air, almost but not quite touching, as we begin our trip south. At the Esso Station in Port Royal, I switch to the wheel well, the narrow space behind the backseat. My sisters shake hands with each other and spread out.

Four hours after the last Stuckey’s stop, we see signs for Cape Hatteras. “We need to get out of this car,” my mother says. There is a package goods store coming up fast on the left.

“I’ll see if these folks know of any motels,” my father says. “We’ll have an hour on the beach and leave first thing in the morning.” He swings the little car into the parking lot and gets out. A few minutes later, he returns with a bottle in a brown paper bag and directions to the Lighthouse Lodge.

We can’t see the ocean from the motel, but we cross the hot pavement and a wooden walkway to the dunes and then step onto an astonishingly long white beach with red, blue, and yellow umbrellas scattered along it like gumdrops.

We run down to the water’s edge, where icy waves numb my small hot feet, sucking away the sand under them so that I become shorter and shorter. My sisters brought Lodge towels on which to stretch out, but only my father remembered to bring something to drink. He takes a long pull from the bottle he has left in the brown bag to stay cool.

Suddenly he scoops me up under my arms. I dangle for a second before he hoists me over his head and onto his shoulders. Holding my hands out on either side as if we are balancing on a tightrope, he walks slowly toward the ocean. One step. Two. The freezing waves splash my thighs. I call out in the breeze, “Far enough!”

But he lets go of my hands pulling us into deeper water, bouncing then paddling to keep our heads above the swells. The next wave rolling towards us is a frothing rogue beginning to break. I cry out again. “Daddy! I don’t want to! Go back!” We will never make it over, and it is too late to retreat. With a half-gasp of air, the sky is gone.

I slam to the bottom, grinding into the sand and sharp broken shells, and am held there as the wave thunders over. Then, still underwater, I’m scraping along the bottom like a piece of beach glass. I claw up for air, but tons of water keep me pressed to the bottom.

I am seeing stars when a strong hand clamps around my upper arm pulling me into the sunlight. A man in bright red swimming trunks sets me on my feet. I stagger, my bathing suit bottom is scooped low with sand. “Are you okay, sweetheart?” he asks.

My mother appears, flying down the beach. Behind her, my father shouts cheerfully, “Hey, cutie, where’d you go?” As we walk back to my sisters, my mother’s quiet is a lit fuse. I reach for my father’s hand to short-circuit the spark. With my other hand, I reach for my mother. That night I sleep with her in one of the big beds, and my father takes the rollaway. We are on the road again at dawn, and I am back in the wheel well. I am becoming famous for sticking it out.

We cheer at the “Welcome to Florida” sign and stop for gas. There are postcards with pink flamingos standing on one leg in front of orange and purple sunsets. Alligators grin because they’ve just eaten someone. As evening falls, we are pulling up to my grandparents’ house. Sure enough, they live on the Gulf of Mexico.

While my parents haul our suitcases inside, my sister and I wander down to their pier and look out across the gulf. I could see Mexico if I could see far enough. I tell my sister, and she says I could walk to Mexico. Anybody can walk on water if they believe they can. “Like if you really believed, you’d just walk off the end of this pier with your shoes on and stuff in your pockets, and you wouldn’t sink because that would prove you believed.”

With my sneakers at the pier’s edge, I concentrate fiercely until I can see myself walking on waves as solid as roadbeds. “All talk and no action,” my sister says, heading back up the pier.

Raised voices reach us as we near the house. The grownups stop speaking until we pass through the living room and close Granny’s bedroom door. “Let’s play who can be quiet the longest,” my sister says, and we climb on the bed to see who can make the other laugh first. We stare at each other as the voices in the living room grow louder. She points a finger at me and then pinches her nose, crossing her eyes. It’s not too funny.

My mother is crying. I point a finger at my sister, pretend I am driving a car, point to myself, and circle a finger near my ear. She rolls her eyes, but we don’t even make the bedsprings squeak. “Last chance,” my mother says through the wall.

“I quit,” my sister says, and just like that, everything is over. In the morning, I get back in the wheel well, and by 8:00 am, we are headed home.

My father begins to sing “Charlie on the MTA.” “Oh, he never returned, no he never returned, and his fate is still unlearned.” The words are sad, but the tune is catchy, and my mother joins in. My parents’ voices sound better together than either does alone and
I wish my friends could hear them. I would say, these, these are my beautiful parents. Because I am watching them, I don’t see the police car behind the overpass. My mother spots it first. “Slow down!”

My father squints quickly in the rearview mirror as the patrol car slams onto the highway, lights flashing, siren wailing. I know we can’t afford a fine, which may be why my father does not take his foot off the gas. He looks in the mirror again and turns to my mother. “Florida cop, Ginny. He’s got no jurisdiction out of state.” He glances from her face to the road and back again. Up ahead, a sign says, “Georgia State Line, One Mile.” The siren is louder. Louder still.

He smiles his slow smile. The one she has told me makes her say yes, every time she means no. “We can make it, Ginny; I know we can.” They look at each other forever and ever, and I hold my breath.

She twists to glance back over the seat. The police car is gaining ground but in the distance, a sign says, “Welcome to the Peach State.” Turning back to the road ahead, my mother sighs, and my father whoops. He slams the car into fifth gear, and we are outlaws gunning for Georgia.

I close my eyes and imagine walking on waves to Mexico. I think maybe one person believing in something just isn’t enough. But if two people believe, anything is possible.

Laura J. Oliver is an award-winning developmental book editor and writing coach, who has taught writing at the University of Maryland and St. John’s College. She is the author of The Story Within (Penguin Random House). Co-creator of The Writing Intensive at St. John’s College, she is the recipient of a Maryland State Arts Council Individual Artist Award in Fiction, an Anne Arundel County Arts Council Literary Arts Award winner, a two-time Glimmer Train Short Fiction finalist, and her work has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Her website can be found here.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 1 Homepage Slider, 3 Top Story, Laura

Deus Ex Machina by Stan Salett

June 11, 2023 by Stan Salett Leave a Comment

Our Lord of Christ Computer
xAnswers all to those who ask
And offers Priests to teach and tutor,
xOthers who need more time in task.
xxBy inputting their deepest dreams,
The supplicants leave little to speculation.
xxThis machine outputs in digital stream,
xnxA flowing language of basic revelation.

-December 2013

Stan Salett has been a policy adviser to the Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton administrations and is the author of The Edge of Politics: Stories from the Civil Rights Movement, the War on Poverty, and the Challenges of School Reform and Beyond the Scene He now lives in Kent County, Maryland and has been an advisor to the Spy Newspapers since 2010. 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed, Opinion

The Two Fundamental American Government Tensions by Tom Timberman

June 10, 2023 by Tom Timberman Leave a Comment

The 13 American colonies/states during the Revolution and until the ratification of the US Constitution functioned in many ways, like independent countries. In fact, it was their legislatures – not the people – that approved the Constitution, as countries would a treaty. The residents of the 13 states were accustomed to identifying themselves by their state first and were jealous of protecting their local powers, and many still are.  

Thus, there were two principal positions at the Constitutional Convention: one wanted a stronger central government and the other wanted to retain their state powers against a weaker national authority. However, after their almost 13 year experience with the weak, dysfunctional Articles of Confederation, the  majority early on accepted a stronger national government. And the Virginia Plan provided the template. And then there is the directly related Constitutional debate over the “Reserved Powers” (10th Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States, nor prohibited by it to the states, are preserved to the states respectively or to the people.” )

However, the conflict over states rights, even after the Civil War reconfirmed the dominance of the Union, continues in 2023. States pass legislation on important issues, that differ from one another, the national consensus and/or the Federal Constitutional position. The states rights’ squabbles now play out in the Federal court system.   

Another vocal group  in 1787, were those who feared that strong states or the powerful Federal Government could crush individuals.  Thus, the Bill of Rights , the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution, were added prior to ratification, giving the Feds authority to protect personal rights, e.g. to practice their religion, to assemble, free speech etc. 

By the middle of the 19th Century though, it became clear that a central government that did nothing regarding individuals participating in the US Congress and/or Executive Branch, was allowing a small minority of very wealthy people from Southern states, to take over the country and threaten to control the people. Thus, Abraham Lincoln and U.S. Grant and millions of Americans learned, at great cost) what their government could do, to impose equal rights before the law, equal access to resources and more, that were embodied in the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. All of which strengthened the hand of the Federal Government. 

Similarly, early in the 20th Century the damaging impact of industrialization expanded the role of the Central Government again, to protect individual workers from abuse by wealthy owners of giant corporations.  Once more the Feds stepped in, this time to rein in industrialists and to regulate how they did business. The strategic goal was to level the economic playing field. 

In the 1930s, following the catastrophe of the Great Depression, the FDR Administration added more missions to the USG. It created organizations to provide work for millions of unemployed Americans and ultimately introduced a basic social safety net. 

As we move through the 21st Century, most, but not all, Americans accept the evolving list of USG tasks and the authority of the Federal Government to continue to protect equal rights, to maintain a more or less level economic playing field as well as an effective social safety net. 

None of us knows specifically what comparable existential events will challenge us in the decades ahead, but the ability of our Federal Government to address them successfully, as in the past, should be a given. 

Tom Timberman is an Army vet, lawyer, former senior Foreign Service officer, adjunct professor at GWU, and economic development team leader or foreign government advisor in war zones. He is the author of four books, lectures locally and at US and European universities. He and his wife are 24 year residents of Kent County.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed, Opinion

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • …
  • 116
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2026

Affiliated News

  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

Sections

  • Sample Page

Spy Community Media

  • Sample Page
  • Subscribe
  • Sample Page

Copyright © 2026 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in