In what would be perceived as a heretical act, Senator John Thune should attempt to save the Trump Presidency. The President needs pushback from people who have supported him and hold positions of respect and power.
Thune, 65, a Senator from the solidly Republican state of South Dakota, is the Majority Leader in the U.S. Senate. He has been in the Senate since 2005 and has enjoyed wide bipartisan respect. His stature now hangs in the balance. As does President Trump’s presidency. As does the Western Alliance known as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
Understandably, Thune has been broadly supportive of Trump. After all they are both Republicans and I suspect Thune generally supports Trump’s directions, if not his style. And to the degree he might have misgivings, his Party’s leader is the President, and to compromise his power is a fraught exercise.
But what should he do when Trump begins to act like Vladimir Putin? Putin has immeasurably weakened Russia in pursuing his Ukraine obsession. Russian deaths, the alienation of many of Russia’s best and brightest, the sapping of financial strength, and beyond are the prices Russians are paying. So even though Trump has thrown Putin a lifeline, since it doesn’t include dominance over the whole of Ukraine, Putin continues to pursue his mad obsession.
The President, likewise. has for some years eyed Greenland and I take Greenland’s potential as a strategic asset in geopolitics at face value. But I also take at face value that the coalition of Western nations could enhance Greenland’s military posture and therefore the West’s geopolitical protection and leverage.
Trump’s obsession stands in the way. He wants credit. He wants the history books to declare his greatness. Treaty-making to achieve important ends would be a lengthy process—tedious and without the promise of star power.
Returning to NATO. It is a valuable combination of political and defense assets that gives its Member States protection. And it costs each Member a whole lot less since the costs are shared. And going it alone could never be the power equivalent of the coalition.
The whole of NATO’s leadership rejects Trump’s unilateral moves on Greenland. And the whole of NATO leadership is not a humble combination. Heels are dug in—understandably. France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden are moving troops to Greenland. And as history verifies when ego-centric leaders begin to loudly maneuver, bad things often happen.
This unfolding affair brings to mind Trump’s broader vulnerability. Unnerving Americans! People do not like to be unnerved. For most, politics, even governance, is something preferred in the rear-view mirror. Stuff happens, and then a year or so later, we get to express ourselves in the voting booth. If we don’t like, say, a tax, then we vote the Party out that championed it.
Back to John Thune. Blowing up NATO is not a tax that can be easily reversed. International politics are enormously complex turning on a range of assessments and temperamental Heads of State. NATO needs to be protected and protect is what real leaders do.
According to voter polls, the Republican Party has enjoyed a perceptual advantage. Trump is threatening that popularity with unnerving moves, some superficial and others anything but.
He decided to put his name on the Kennedy Center. He bulldozed the East Wing of the White House. He began using the tax code to buy votes. All of this is happening and much more as people worry about the implications of artificial intelligence in their own lives. And while trying to understand cryptocurrencies, they run into the Trump family with their massive stake. Or, find their favorite consumer goods more and more expensive.
Trump is at the edge, the cliff’s edge. Blowing up NATO in a volatile, even toxic environment, will evoke harm that even the less engaged will intuitively understand.
John Thune can quietly let the White House know he does not support taking Greenland by force. That Trump better use the force of diplomacy, not troops on the ground.
Relatedly, the Supreme Court must wake up. While I understand the Court’s studious pace, the Nation faces a use of executive power that is not just unconstitutional but perverse. When a country does something the President doesn’t like, he lashes out with a tariff. He doesn’t even pretend to get Congressional approval, even though the authority to use tariffs as broadly as the President has done is clearly a Congressional prerogative. The arguments before the Court’s Justices were in early November. It is time for a decision; the failure to act on a timely basis engages an institutional risk that is not acceptable.
Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al writes on themes from his book, Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books.


